CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– POLITICS
Aug. 27, 2008 – 1:07 p.m.
GOP Platform Writers Reject Drilling In Alaska Refuge
By Kathleen Hunter, CQ Staff
MINNEAPOLIS — Republican platform writers beat back an insurgent attempt Wednesday to endorse drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge amid concerns that such a move could undercut John McCain ’s effort to win the White House in November.
The 112-member GOP platform-writing committee is hammering out the party’s policy blueprint here in advance of next week’s Republican National Convention in neighboring St. Paul.
Unlike President Bush and most of the Republican base, McCain, the senior senator from Arizona, does not support ANWR drilling, although he has left open the possibility of reconsidering that view in the future.
In an effort to avoid a rift with the presumptive nominee, the draft proposal unveiled Tuesday called for “accelerated exploration, drilling and development in America, from new oil fields off the nation’s coasts to onshore fields such as those in Montana, North Dakota and Alaska” but was silent on the specific issue of ANWR.
Platform committee member David Boyle of Alaska proposed adding language that would explicitly include drilling in ANWR, saying the issue enjoyed broad support, was very important to voters and should be addressed in the platform. Boyle pointed out that he has ties to the McCain campaign — he is listed as the Alaska contact on the campaign’s Web site — but said the issue was too important to ignore in the platform.
Backers of Boyle’s amendment argued that it would translate into support for Republicans across the country.
“I don’t believe that there is a stronger way to support our candidate than to support what our people want,” said platform member Cathie Adams, of Texas. “This has become the number one issue in this campaign . . . I think this is a very positive move . . . one that would bring people to the party and to our candidate.”
Opponents countered that inserting the language would do more harm than good, saying it would undermine McCain, who, they pointed out, recently came around to supporting increased drilling in the outer continental shelf. They also pointed out that the underlying language was carefully drafted to avoid embarrassing McCain, while at the same time not precluding drilling in ANWR, which many said they supported.
“The goal is to not have this serve as a lightning rod,” said Terry Strine of Delaware, a member of the platform committee’s energy and environment subcommittee, which debated for more than four hours Tuesday.
“This will bring difficulties and challenges for John McCain and none of us want to do that,” Strine added.
Others echoed that concern.
“We have a nominee for the party who is entitled to a platform he can run on, and we should not create unnecessary conflicts between the nominee and the platform,” said James Bopp of Indiana.
Platform members said they were confident that McCain, if elected, eventually would be convinced to support drilling in a 2,000-acre coastal plain section of ANWR.
GOP Platform Writers Reject Drilling In Alaska Refuge
“We are blessed with a candidate who actually thinks and is capable of changing his position when he receives new data,” said Jeff Grossman of Oregon. “We know that president McCain will eventually come around to our position- but he’s not there yet.”
Some platform members said it was important to call for ANWR drilling in the platform to send a message to McCain.
“To let him know how strong the sentiment is on this issue, we do him a service, not a disservice,” said Sandra McDade of Louisiana.
“This is an accountability tool, and we’re accountable to our base and to the people who sent us here,” said Kendal Unruh of Colorado.
The platform-committee did accept a proposal, offered by Kim Skipper of Alaska, that would oppose efforts to permanently block access to ANWR, a move that panel members viewed as a viable compromise for now.
“President McCain will be in a much better position to get this accomplished than Senator McCain,” said Mike Fair of South Carolina.
Republicans hailed rejection of the proposal as a sign that members of the party were willing to put aside their own views to avoid crossing McCain.
“That shows the support that Senator McCain has in this room,” said Trey Grayson of Kentucky, who co-chaired the environment subcommittee. “That’s a real sign of unity. It’s not lip service. That’s action.”
With less internal disagreement, the platform committee also rejected a proposal to discourage the export of oil and gas garnered from any new leases.
Opponents were concerned that the amendment would force McCain to take an anti-free-trade stance prior to the election. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour said the proposal ran counter to the open-market, free-trade positions Republicans outlined in the economic portion of their platform. Barbour is chairman of the platform-writing panel’s economic subcommittee, which spelled out a policy of lower taxes, decreased regulation and smaller government. The panel approved that portion of the platform Tuesday.


Comments
I don't know how EXPORTING oil from areas we own to OTHER countries enhances our energy supply. But wait a minute, maybe this Republican energy plan about drilling in environmentally sensitive areas isn't about enhancing our energy supply, but solely about helping the oil companies. Gee, could that be true? Would Republicans do such a thing? I'll leave it to others to answer that question, although I do have my own thoughts on the answer.
This is a huge blow to Michele Bachmann (MN-6), the Minnesota insty-expert on energy who is one of Congress' loudest advocates of drilling in ANWR. Bachmann is on the RNC platform committee, so this is a pretty good indication of what little influence she has there.
Survey USA just did polls in CO-04, Chris Carney's district, and KS-02, Boyda's district. This districts gave, respectively, 58, 59, and 60% of the vote to Bush in 2004, deep red territory. One of the questions they asked was "Which would you support more, a candidate who supported more drilling or one who supported developing more alternative energy resources?" In each of these deep red districts voters chose the second by double digit margins. If this is any indication that Republican strategy might not be working as well as republicans had hoped.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: