CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
April 16, 2008 – 4:28 a.m.
Some Pennsylvanians Unfazed by ‘Bitter’ Comments
By Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff
YORK, Pa. -- The media frenzy surrounding Barack Obama ’s recent comments about economically distressed small town Pennsylvanians has been overblown, according to many Pennsylvania voters. And they say it won’t influence their vote. But others say the remarks could come back to haunt him in Tuesday’s primary or a general election if he wins the Democratic presidential nomination.
Obama has come under fire from Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton , presumed Republican nominee John McCain and others since the liberal Web site Huffington Post revealed last Friday that Obama told an audience at a San Francisco fundraiser that rural Pennsylvanians “get bitter” and “cling” to guns, religion, opposition to trade and distaste for other groups because of their economic situation.
“It was a little thing,” said Bill Scheffer, a 77-year-old career truck driver from Bedford. “It doesn’t matter.”
But Scheffer describes his voting preference as “Anybody but Obama.”
Here in South-central Pennsylvania, where many small town voters believe in their right to bear arms and are just as fervent about their religion, Obama’s comments might be expected to evoke uniform condemnation. But even some supporters of other candidates are willing to cut the Illinois senator a little slack.
Cliff Rowell, a Republican, agreed that the comments have received too much scrutiny.
“I think they made a mountain out of a molehill,” he said.
But Mark Treider of York, a commercial pilot who flew F-4s in the Air Force, said he was offended by being stereotyped as a “hayseed.”
“He came flat out and said that people in the middle of the country, and Pennsylvania, they tote guns, they go to church they’re xenophobes, they’re racists and things like that and that’s simply not true and I think it’s an underestimate of what the country’s really all about,” Treider said. “The working class people around here are what makes this country,” he said.
Treider re-registered as a Democrat this year so he could vote for Clinton as part of conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” effort to keep the Democratic primary competitive.
But he also says Clinton would make a better president than Obama.
With an electorate already heavily polarized, any shift among Democrats from Obama to Clinton will be at the margins of the small set of Pennsylvania voters who remain undecided, according to Muhlenberg College professor Chris Borick, who conducts polling in the Lehigh Valley and across the state.
“It will play or have an effect on the margin. If you look at it, a lot of the voters who would be most offended by that comment are most likely going to support Hillary Clinton anyway. That’s not to say, again, that moving a few of those five or six [percent] undecideds in one direction wouldn’t be affected by a comment like that,” Borick said. “But the general election it would be interesting to see, especially among independents.”
Some Pennsylvanians Unfazed by ‘Bitter’ Comments
But for the nominating contest will almost certainly be decided by the unpledged party leaders and elected officials who are “superdelegates” to the Democratic convention in August. And the latest flap could cost Obama public support if Democrats who rely on Republican votes to win re-election come to believe that Obama is more detested by their GOP constituents than is Clinton.
Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks said in a Capitol Hill interview on Monday that the Democratic campaign has served to improve Clinton’s standing, if only marginally, with some Republicans.
“ Barack Obama has done something unparalleled in modern political history: He has made Hillary Clinton almost seem like she has a scintilla of reason,” he said. “It is so surreal it beggars description on my part.”
Democrats are not likely too many cues from Republicans, but they are divided on the significance of Obama’s remarks.
Rep. Brad Miller , D-N.C., an uncommitted superdelegate, defended Obama in an interview with CQ Politics on Monday.
“I think Sen. Obama has already said pretty clearly that he understands the frustrations of rural America,” Miller said. “He made a valid point inartfully.”
Miller said he expects Obama to be the Democratic nominee.
Rep. Marcy Kaptur , D-Ohio, said she wondered whether Obama actually said the words attributed to him until fellow Rep. Tim Ryan , D-Ohio, told her an audio tape exists.
Kaptur’s reaction: “In a word,” she said, “Revealing.”
“His remarks seem counter to other statements that he has made,” Kaptur said. “If you were [Clinton] wouldn’t you go after him on this?”
Kaptur, an uncommitted superdelegate whose district went narrowly for Clinton, said Obama could suffer damage in rural-state primaries even after the upcoming series of industrial-state contests in April and May. But, she said, there could be a silver lining for Obama.
“It shows that he’s human, so maybe there is a good side to this,” she said.
In Pennsylvania’s Lehigh Valley, which many experts view as a microcosm of the state, Muhlenberg professor Borick says an Obama-McCain general election matchup would be fascinating because it would test the overall Democratic trend in the state, with McCain possibly appealing to Democrats and independents who favored Ronald Reagan in the 1980s.
Some Pennsylvanians Unfazed by ‘Bitter’ Comments
Borick suggests that Obama risks alienating voters if he does not choose his words more carefully: “He’s got a problem in terms of sounding aloof.”




Comments
Of course there are always SOME voters who would still vote for Hitler - that means nothing - Obama is a fraud - who wears the same WHITE shirt day after day. He lies so well he has fooled a lot of people - As PT Burnum says - there's a sucker born every minute
So far,we cant accuse Hillary as elitist.John McCain could improve his English pronounciation.Finally,we dont need Rep.Geoff Davis on the American political Davis.He may well throw voters back to the Democrats
The only thing missing from the comments by Obama was a reference to pick-up trucks displaying the Confederate flag. Will this be forthcoming? Electing this elitist President would rank among some of the worst mistakes the electorate ever made. He and his wife make even the Clintons look good -- a difficult thing at best. What else will we be learning about this slick candidate?
The reasons why people aren't angry are: a) Obama is right b) They are tired of the media trumping up minor stories
It's not "bitter," it's "ciing to guns, cling to religion" that seals it for me. I don't understand how a person of faith could be so disrespectful regarding the faith of others. Or does Rev Wright offer the only true path? As I type, I realize that Obama truly turns my stomach.
Sounds like people like Evelyn helped elect the biggest mistake in history - George W. Bush. A child would do a better job than the idiot we have.
Huffington Post-William Ayers, in the age of terrorism, is Obamas Willie Horton said Former counterterrorism expert Larry Johnson, There has been sudden information linking Obama to a former member of the radical Weathermen Underground group that claimed responsibility for a dozen bombings between 1970 and 1974. The former Weatherman, William Ayers, told the New York Times. I don't regret setting bombs...I feel we didn't do enough. Obama and Ayers were members of the board between 92-02. In addition, Ayers contributed to Obama's election to the Senate. They lived within a few blocks of each other in the trendy Hyde Park section of Chicago and moved in the same liberal-progressive circles. Larry Johnson, a former counterterrorism official at the CIA and the State Department, predicts Republicans would seize on the Ayers case, and again raises questions about Obama's judgment. WHERES MAINSTREAM MEDIA LIKE CNN & MSNBC WHY ARE THEY HIDING THIS MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM VOTERS??
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: