CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
April 24, 2008 – 12:12 p.m.
Democrats Push Gas Price Plans; GOP Snipes
By Coral Davenport and Edward Epstein, CQ Staff
With gasoline prices hitting new records, lawmakers are tossing out a grab bag of election year proposals aimed at letting voters know they feel their pain at the pump.
Several Democratic senators want to block weapons deals with oil-producing countries. And Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain of Arizona has been suggesting a fuel tax “holiday” for motorists this summer.
The Democratic leadership got into the act Thursday. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., urged the administration to stop adding oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, while Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , D-Nev., asked the Energy and Natural Resources and Commerce, Science and Transportation chairmen to assemble a package of proposals aimed at offering short-term price relief.
The frenzy in Congress over gasoline prices has become a rite of spring in recent years, as Democrats and Republicans under pressure from constituents planning summer road trips jockey for political advantage.
But as lawmakers search for practical solutions, they inevitably confront the reality that their options are severely limited.
“There’s little Congress or the president can do to reduce oil and gas prices in the short term,” said Paul Bledsoe, spokesman for the National Commission on Energy Policy, a bipartisan group that advises Congress on energy matters. “This is a long-term, structural issue.”
Bledsoe said anything that could fundamentally increase supply or lower demand for petroleum products will play out “over a couple of years, not weeks or months.”
The recent price spike puts Pelosi and Reid in the same awkward position their Republican predecessors were in two years ago. In 2006, Pelosi blasted the White House and congressional leadership for rising gasoline prices and promised a “common-sense plan to help bring skyrocketing gas prices down.”
Republican leaders quickly offered a series of proposals that went nowhere and ultimately backfired, notably former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s suggestion to send Americans $100 checks, which was ridiculed by fellow Republicans.
For weeks, House Republicans have taunted the speaker for what they call the “Pelosi Premium.” Pelosi sought to turn the tables Thursday, blaming Republicans for stalling key components of the Democratic energy agenda, including legislation aimed at “price gouging,” and efforts to roll back billions of dollars in oil company tax breaks.
She said suspending additions to the petroleum reserve would inject more supply into the market, easing prices quickly and lowering retail prices by 5 cents to 10 cents a gallon.
Pelosi insisted her plan would have a bigger impact than McCain’s proposal to suspend the federal motor fuels tax this summer, arguing there is no guarantee that savings would be passed along to customers.
Withholding Weapons
Democrats Push Gas Price Plans; GOP Snipes
Meanwhile, a group of Senate Democrats urged President Bush to block $14 billion in U.S. arms sales to Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries members that refuse to increase production.
Charles E. Schumer of New York, Byron L. Dorgan of North Dakota, Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania signed a letter to Bush, as did Vermont independent Bernard Sanders , who caucuses with the Democrats.
“The Saudis have to understand this is a two-way street,” Schumer said. “We provide them with weapons, our troops provide them with protection, and then they rake us over the coals when it comes to oil. The Saudis and Big Oil are in cahoots and this administration has coddled them both for far too long.”
Experts question whether the proposals get to the heart of high prices. “Diverting oil from the [strategic petroleum reserve], the gas tax holiday, even blackmailing oil-exporting countries — none of this is going to change things overnight,” said Tyson Slocum, an energy policy analyst at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Bledsoe said the kinds of measures that can move prices will take time, such as the increase in vehicle fuel-economy standards that Congress enacted last year. A 10-year transition to a new fleet of fuel-efficient vehicles “will reduce fuel demand over many years,” he said.
“Most members of Congress recognize this as a structural problem,” Bledsoe said. “They know that in the short term, not a lot’s going to happen. They’ll need to coalesce around long-term solutions.”




Comments
All this hand-wringing by the politicians over 'short term' solutions, and not one word about opening ANWR for drilling, or drilling off-shore to increase our own petroleum production. That is the best way...not the quickest, but the best way...to insure we have petroleum independence for the future. We can do this, and not be dependent on OPEC if we simply tell the sincere environmentalists that this problem is more important to all Americans than is their concerns about upseting the caribou.
In response to Mr. Thaxton's comment, the solution is not more drilling which would lead to a greater dependence on fossill fuels. There simply is NOT enough fossil fuels even if we do drill off the coast and in ANWAR to deal with the rapidly growing demand. Our focus should be on conservation and alternative fuels. Also, the amount of oil to be found in ANWAR or off the coasts will not make a dent in oil prices because there the percentage of oil to be found there is too small. Why risk the lives of animals (God's creatures, for people who believe in God) off the coasts and in ANWAR for something that really would not do anything to bring prices down.
Jason, are you kidding me? The amount of space in ANWAR that would be used is so small in relationship to the total size of ANWAR as to be virtually inconsequential! As for God, if I remember my scriptures, He gave us dominion over the animals! Regardless, the real issue is refining capacity. With natural gas running at $1.30 a therm (without summer electric demand or hurricane damage) and gas nudging up to $4, perhaps some common sense will start to happen about all these "green" restrictions . . . How about suspending the need for boutique gas blends for this summer? How about cutting the State Sales Tax? Wait until the Chinese and Hugo start drilling in the Gulf instead . . . I'll bet they'll be REAL conscientious about the environment. . . WAKE UP
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: