CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
– HEALTH
Corrected May 31, 2008 – 5:13 p.m.
Birth Control Provision Survives in Supplemental, Upsetting Some in GOP
By Liriel Higa and Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff
A proposal that would cut the price of birth control pills and devices at university health clinics and Planned Parenthood centers was retained in the Senate version of the war supplemental spending bill sent to the House on Thursday.
The provision seeks to undo part of a 2006 deficit reduction law (PL 109-171) that squeezed a total of $38.9 billion in savings from a variety of programs, including federal student loans, Medicare and Medicaid.
That law removed university clinics and private birth control clinics from the list of entities eligible for “nominal” pricing under the Public Health Service Act (PL 78-410) — a law enacted in 1944 and revised numerous times since then — which outlines a series of federal health program partnerships with states, localities and nonprofit schools, among other provisions.
Proponents of the drug discounts that benefited low-income women and college students say those discounts were not intended to be discontinued by the 2006 law.
The administration saw it differently, and roughly 400 college, community and Planned Parenthood clinics lost birth control discounts.
An amendment to the supplemental war spending bill adopted, 75-22, by the Senate on Thursday would restore the drug price discounts. That amendment would also provide a variety of domestic spending.
The move angered some Republicans.
“Sneaking a divisive provision into a war spending bill that will help Planned Parenthood . . . is politics as usual — not change,” said John Hart, spokesman for conservative Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. Hart said Wednesday that Coburn was looking at ways to address the provision, but it wasn’t the subject of any floor debate Thursday.
Echoes of Obama Language
The provision in the supplemental spending bill that would restore the discounts mirrors legislation (
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, Obama’s rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, is also a cosponsor.
Proponents of the repeal say that providing lower-cost birth control reduces abortions.
Obama’s legislation was cosponsored by Majority Leader Harry Reid , D-Nev., and Bob Casey , D-Pa., who are both abortion opponents.
But the conservative Family Research Council issued a statement Wednesday decrying the provision.
Although the White House has broadly expressed its opposition to the inclusion of non-war items in the war supplemental (
Democrats sought to include the repeal of the birth control restrictions in a previous war funding bill, but it was removed during the House Appropriations Committee markup last year.
Crowley’s stand-alone bill on the issue has considerable support in the House.
Angela Barranco, a spokeswoman for Crowley, said the supplemental is an appropriate vehicle for the provision. “It is not the only domestic priority included in the emergency spending bill, and it’s revenue-neutral,” she said.
First posted May 22, 2008 11:31 a.m.
Correction
Corrects to say proposal would cut the price of birth control pills and devices.




POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: