CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
– POLITICS
June 16, 2008 – 8:10 p.m.
Moderate Republicans Express Concern Over Push for Conservative Agenda
By Alan K. Ota, CQ Staff
Moderate House Republicans are pushing back against efforts to march the GOP Conference in a conservative direction for this fall’s campaign season.
The centrists are reluctant to build their campaigns around a promise to stop earmarking funds for local projects or a call for an extreme makeover of the tax code. Those are the priorities of the House GOP’s conservative Republican Study Committee (RSC).
Some moderate Republicans plan to meet Tuesday with John A. Boehner , R-Ohio, to urge the minority leader not to issue edicts that might undermine moderates’ ability to vote in sync with prevailing sentiment in their districts.
An aide to one Republican lawmaker said the moderates want Boehner and the party to focus on gasoline price increases rather than on earmarks, a proposal for a two-tier flat tax or a proposed constitutional amendment to curb the growth of federal spending — all of which are being pushed by the RSC and are embraced by Boehner’s leadership team.
“Conservatives want to build a stronger brand for the party. But some moderates feel they each already have their own brand,” said one senior GOP aide.
Conservatives have argued for a sharper, more conservative agenda, and have pushed for votes in the conference to put members on record on issues including a mandatory earmark moratorium for House Republicans.
Jeb Hensarling of Texas, chairman of the RSC, wants the GOP Conference to take conservative stands on issues and is arguing against trying to satisfy moderate Republicans from swing districts. “In Texas, the only things you find in the middle of the road are yellow lines and dead armadillos,” Hensarling said.
Mark Steven Kirk , R-Ill., a leader of the centrist Tuesday Group, has backed the idea of a showdown vote on an earmark moratorium.
But other moderates are straddling the fence and joining forces with more cautious conservatives like appropriator Jack Kingston of Georgia, an RSC member who argues that the best strategy is to focus on bipartisan proposals to address the gas price issue with increased oil and gas drilling. “Shifting the focus to an earmark moratorium right now could step on the energy message,’’ said Kingston.
Not an Exact Match With McCain
While the RSC has been pushing for an agenda aimed at energizing the Republican Party’s conservative base, moderates in the Tuesday Group and the Republican Main Street Partnership would prefer a general election strategy that matches up with efforts by presumed GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona to move to the center in order to appeal to independent voters.
McCain has split from many in the congressional wing of his party on contentious issues like global warming, campaign finance and a proposal to repeal President Bush’s ban on broader federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
And McCain has close ties to centrists including Kirk and Fred Upton of Michigan in the House and to senators with an independent streak, including Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Gordon H. Smith of Oregon.
Moderate Republicans Express Concern Over Push for Conservative Agenda
Kirk has argued that Republicans and McCain should move to the center on issues like stem cell research and global warming in order to appeal to swing voters.
Boehner has emphasized aligning House Republicans with McCain in general, while ignoring areas where there are differences.
The minority leader has called for more domestic oil and gas drilling — a goal shared by conservatives and moderates — while skirting McCain’s opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Boehner has added RSC-backed planks to the House GOP Conference agenda, including the flat tax and measures to help small businesses cover health care costs. But he has generally stuck by his long-standing vow not to twist arms like his predecessor, former Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas (1985-2006).
So far, Boehner’s flexible leadership style has given rank-and-file House Republicans a green light to break ranks. Some of them have done so to support legislation including the 2007 minimum wage increase (PL 110-28) and a farm policy rewrite (








Comments
I live in Rep. Kirk's district, so I know that he agrees with the Democrat platform more often than he agrees with the Republican platform . He says that he wants to end earmarks, but he ensured that the federal government spent money, in his district, for commuter trains, schools, housing projects, and police depts., although that federal spending is unconstitutional. He's pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-gay marriage, and anti-Iraq surge. Last year, the Illinois Minutemen said that they "denounced him."
Earmarks, of course, have absolutely nothing to do with being moderate or conservative, but your erroneous equating of the two would seem to imply that moderates are corrupt. Was that your intention?
IL Conservative's post at 10 a.m. hits the nail squarely on the head in stating the agenda of conservative Republicans: instead of wanting money spent in their districts for solutions to problems in the U.S.A., spend the money in Iraq. If conservative Republicans want to do that, they should get elected in Iraq and spend Iraq's oil money not the American taxpayers' hard earned money.
Jason Platt has it exactly right. The GOP leadership and the Conservative rank and file have abandoned the average American. They are more interested in feathering their nests, enhancing their perks and building their stranglehold on power than anything else. If they eliminate earmarks, it will only be to institute something sneakier and harder to track that will accomplish the same thing: giving them government funds to use to buy votes. The public has seen through this and the three GOP losses in three special elections are the result. Until and unless the GOP start getting themselves in synch with American as opposed to Conservative, public opinion they will continue to suffer.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: