CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
July 22, 2008 – 12:02 a.m.
Udall Moves Ahead in Colorado Senate Race
By Greg Giroux, CQ Staff
With a hefty war chest and a lead in the polls, Colorado Democratic Rep. Mark Udall ’s prospects of taking over the Senate seat of retiring Republican Sen. Wayne Allard appear to be brightening.
CQ Politics is changing its rating of the high-profile Colorado Senate race to reflect a slight edge for Udall, who is facing Republican former Rep. Bob Schaffer.
By shifting the rating of the Colorado Senate race to “Leans Democratic” from “No Clear Favorite,” CQ Politics now considers Udall as a narrow front-runner in a highly competitive race that had been previously classified as a toss-up. Udall, who represents the Boulder area, and Schaffer, who represented Colorado’s eastern plains from 1997 through 2002 and sought Colorado’s other Senate seat in 2004, are unopposed in their party’s primaries on August 12.
Though CQ Politics does not base its race ratings changes primarily on polling data, it’s unmistakable that Udall has moved out to a consistent lead in a series of polls, including a nine-point advantage in a Public Policy Polling survey that was conducted earlier this month.
Udall’s edge can be attributed to other factors. The national political environment continues to be more problematic for the Republicans than the Democrats. In Colorado, Democrats made big gains in the 2006 election. Barack Obama at the moment is at least an even-money bet to defeat John McCain in Colorado, which in 2004 backed President Bush over Democratic nominee John Kerry by 5 percentage points. Republicans still outnumber Democrats on the voter registration rolls in Colorado, though the gap is narrowing and political independents are now more numerous than either Republicans or Democrats.
Both Udall and Schaffer will be vying for the votes of political independents, though the two men do have plenty of disagreements on policy issues. Udall has had a mostly liberal voting record and Schaffer had a mostly conservative voting record.
Udall has an early edge in fundraising over Schaffer. As July began, Udall had $4 million left to spend, compared to $2.8 million for Schaffer, according to updated campaign finance reports that were filed last week. Udall’s cash-on-hand advantage narrowed in this year’s second quarter because Udall spent about three times as much as Schaffer did in the three-month period that ended June 30.
The Colorado Senate race is the third in which CQ Politics presently gives the non-incumbent party the edge over the defending party. In all three cases, the Democrats have the edge to win Republican-held seats.
CQ Politics also has applied a rating of “Leans Democrat” to the Senate race in New Mexico, where Democratic Rep. Tom Udall , a cousin of Mark Udall , presently is favored against Republican Rep. Steve Pearce for the seat of retiring Republican Sen. Pete V. Domenici .
CQ Politics has long rated the Virginia seat as the most likely to change party hands among the 35 on this year’s ballots. Democrat Mark Warner, a former governor, has a strong edge over Republican James S. Gilmore III, another former governor, for the seat of retiring Republican Sen. John W. Warner . The Virginia Senate race is rated “Democrat Favored,” meaning that Warner has a decisive advantage but that an upset by Gilmore cannot be completely ruled out.




Comments
An upset by Gillmore can be ruled out. He has about $200,000 on hand versus $5 million for Warner. The polls aren't even that close. Gillmore's only hope would be if Obama chooses Warner as VP. It's over.
Sen. George "macaca" Allen thought that it was over and that he had it in the bag two years ago. Don't burn your bridges until you get to them.
o Labor is such a huge issue this year in Colorado and every candidate needs to be held accountable on their stance on this issue, including Mark Udall. Udall is a prime example of a candidate who supports an unacceptable issue. Not only is he against right-to-work in general, but he favors the Employee Free Choice Act. This federal "gem" has Big Labor supporters frothing at the mouth to get more big-money union supporters like Udall into the national ranks by taking away the freedom of secret elections from non-unionized workers. Please! This is ridiculous!
Lee, George Allen was never as far ahead of Jim Webb in the polls as Mark Warner is now, and he had the advantage of incumbency. This one is a blow-out as long as Warner is not Obama's VP pick.
Udall will fade as his liberal leanings are revealed. He is a big-labor liberal who takes much of his campaign funds from organized labor, and then supports the Employee Free Choice Act, which will boost union numbers dramatically. He also impedes energy development in Colorado and nationwilde at every turn, contributing to our current energy crisis. Bob will close that gap...
With Colorado voters starting to see Udall's liberal leanings, every poll by Rasmussen Reports has constantly shown Schaffer gaining ground on Udall. A month ago, Udall had around a 10 point lead, today only 3 points. In Virginia, I was just on vacation there, and I saw at least a 10-1 ratio in which Gilmore signs outnumbered Warner signs in residential houses. Maybe there the polls are wrong.
To Ross and Roy. Get real. Oil shale developement in Colorado is not going to happen. The Colorado river doesn't have the capacity to serve California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado water needs let alone the millions of gallons per day to extract oil from rocks. You two are typical of the anti union pro free market right wing noise machine.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: