CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– POLITICS
Sept. 19, 2008 – 12:12 a.m.
Business Groups Going Directly to the Airwaves on Behalf of Candidates
By Bart Jansen, CQ Staff
Rep. Mark Udall , the Democrats’ Senate candidate in Colorado, is slammed on television as indifferent to high gas prices. In New Hampshire, Jeanne Shaheen is called a “taxing machine.”
Those political barbs and many others are not coming from other campaigns or from political parties. They are part of this year’s salvo from business groups that are buying political ads rather than making campaign contributions so that they can deliver their message directly to voters in races they think they can influence.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, aims to spend $20 million on “educational” ads. “We certainly are engaging very much in congressional races,” said J.P. Fielder, a Chamber spokesman.
The Chamber’s spending on advertising dwarfs the $200,000 that the group raised and spent this election cycle through its PAC. The business group buys time for ads like the one aired in Colorado that claimed Udall voted “no” 19 times on breaking the country’s dependence on foreign oil and reducing gasoline prices.
“Tell Mark Udall we need relief from high gas prices,” the commercial concluded.
Udall’s campaign says it has tallied $8.6 million in “attack” ads purchased by third-party groups.
“These are big-money outside special-interest groups who are terrified that Mark Udall will win because they know he can’t be bought,” said spokeswoman Tara Trujillo.
The Chamber also spent $365,038 in late August on ads critical of Democrat Shaheen’s record as governor, while the anti-tax group Club for Growth.net is spending $212,831 in New Hampshire this week, according to Federal Election Commission records.
The Chamber’s ad cited enactment of property taxes and higher taxes on “skiing, movies, fishing and phone bills” as evidence that Shaheen “is a taxing machine.”
A campaign spokeswoman said the ads distort Shaheen’s record.
Local business associations in Manchester and Nashua distanced themselves from the ads, noting on one Web site that “views of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are not reflective of the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce.”
When Reps. Heather A. Wilson and Steve Pearce squared off for the GOP nomination to succeed retiring Republican Sen. Pete V. Domenici , Club for Growth.net, spent $562,073 on advertisements criticizing Wilson in the month before New Mexico’s June 3 primary.
One ad tried to link Wilson to Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif. — not a flattering cohort for a Republican — because all three supported a children’s health-insurance program. Another ad said Wilson voted to raise taxes and supported “dozens of wasteful pork projects.”
Business Groups Going Directly to the Airwaves on Behalf of Candidates
Wilson called the ads “a huge factor” in her narrow loss to Pearce, who now faces Democratic Rep. Tom Udall in the general election. “If we lose that Senate seat, Republicans in the Senate are going to have the Club for Growth to blame,” Wilson said.
Shaky Political Marriage
While the Chamber and other business groups are putting their money behind GOP candidates in targeted races, the party’s congressional campaign fundraising arms are feeling a little neglected.
“A lot of business people have flipped over and given money to the Democrats,” said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch , R-Utah. “We need the business community to wake up.”
Among the biggest PACs, the National Association of Realtors, the National Beer Wholesalers Association and the Credit Union National Association are all giving more money to Democratic candidates than to Republicans this year, after preferring Republicans four years ago.
The Realtors’ PAC has given $1.76 million to Democrats and $1.35 million to Republicans during this election cycle. During the last presidential cycle, the Realtors’ PAC favored Republicans $2 million to $1.8 million.
The Realtors’ PAC spent $161,920 in September on advertising in support of Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez , D-Texas; $238,308 on ads for Rep. Jerry McNerney , D-Calif.; and $382,500 on ads for Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski , D-Pa.
The Credit Union PAC has given $955,250 to Democrats and $872,799 to Republicans this cycle. In 2004, the PAC preferred Republicans, with $1.8 million going to the GOP and $537,000 to Democrats. The credit unions have spent $135,664 on direct mail supporting an unsuccessful House candidate in Maine, Democrat Adam Cote.
“Your relationship with downtown is based on power,” said National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Cole of Oklahoma. “They’re not true believers. I respect that. Yeah, we’d like to get more support. Sure. Do we think they’re running a big risk? Yes.”
Cole’s committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee have been working to try to hold their own in the fundraising competition despite being in the minority in both chambers.
After raising $90 million through July 31, compared with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s $115 million, the House GOP panel asked Drew Maloney, managing director at Ogilvy Government Relations, to work part time on improving relations with the business community. Maloney was an aide to former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas (1985-2006).
Congressional Republicans are warning that businesses will need Senate Republicans to be able to successfully filibuster legislation (
Businesses have tried “to ingratiate themselves with the Democratic majority,” said a Republican campaign operative. “That love affair is slowly crumbling as they continue to pass more anti-business legislation.”
Business Groups Going Directly to the Airwaves on Behalf of Candidates
An energy lobbyist said donor fatigue has set in, and it’s difficult to persuade someone in, for instance, the coal business that they should open their Rolodexes and bundle contributions while presidential candidates in both parties are criticizing coal-burning.
“Even within the party, some of the struggle has been mobilizing the traditional tree-shakers,” the lobbyist said. “It’s not just oil companies and energy companies that are being attacked.”




Comments
Have you seen what the "Chamber of Commerce" has been doing to Franken in Minnesota?
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: