CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
Sept. 25, 2008 – 11:41 p.m.
Rescue Plan Knocked Off Course
By Benton Ives and Alan K. Ota, CQ Staff
Negotiators reconvened on Capitol Hill late Thursday in an effort to get negotiations on a $700 billion financial rescue back on track after a contentious White House meeting where House Republicans pushed a counterproposal.
The Bush administration dispatched Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. for more bipartisan talks after another dramatic and unpredictable day in which a bipartisan “agreement on principles” announced in the afternoon was knocked off course by early evening.
In late evening, the fate of the administration’s plan remained in doubt, as rank-and-file members of both parties continued to take potshots at it. And the involvement of the Republican and Democratic presidential nominees appeared to complicate rather than facilitate an effort to send legislation to the House and Senate floors before Congress’ pre-election adjournment.
Partisan recriminations were thick just a day after congressional leaders agreed to heed President Bush’s call to work together on the plan.
House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank , D-Mass., blamed the uproar on “House Republicans, who in some kind of arrangement with [GOP presidential nominee John] McCain went off into the whatever.”
Democrats said they were caught off guard when the House GOP plan was presented at a White House meeting with Bush. That gathering had been designed to smooth the way for a bipartisan deal based on the administration’s core plan of buying risky assets from financial institutions, largely mortgage-backed securities.
But Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, part of a House GOP task force that Minority Leader John A. Boehner , R-Ohio, appointed two days ago to come up with a plan, said Democrats were kept informed “all day” about the task force’s proposal, which centers on offering government insurance to holders of risky mortgage-backed securities, with the holders financing the plan through premium payments.
“The bottom line is [House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ] says she needs a majority of us to go along with this bill. So it’s important for us to have a bipartisan agreement,” Cantor said, reflecting the widespread discomfort with Bush’s plan in House Republican ranks.
One GOP aide said Pelosi was informed of the Republican alternative a couple of hours before it was unveiled Thursday morning.
Pelosi, D-Calif., said Thursday night: “I don’t know the full substance of it, but if it’s something that can be included in the bill, in terms of the authority given to the Treasury secretary, I’m sure that can be worked out. If it’s contradictory to the purposes of the legislation, then that’s up to the secretary to decide.”
After the late Thursday meeting broke up, Frank said that House Republicans had not participated, while Senate Republicans and Democrats from both chambers were present.
Asked about discussion of the House Republican plan, chief Senate GOP negotiator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire said that “we’re talking about a lot of things, but probably not that.”
Installment Plan
Rescue Plan Knocked Off Course
Paulson arrived on Capitol Hill in the evening using a set of principles negotiated by lawmakers earlier in the day as a starting point.
Under that broad agreement, Frank said the Treasury’s proposed authority to buy up to $700 billion in troubled assets from the nation’s financial institutions would be parceled out in installments, starting with $250 billion immediately.
The agreement also would require the Treasury to set limits on executive pay for companies that sell their bad assets to the program. The government could take profit-sharing warrants for all asset purchases.
But House Republicans, including their representative in the talks, Financial Services ranking Republican Spencer Bachus of Alabama, stood back, stressing that there was no deal.
Boehner spokesman Brian Steel said Bachus was not empowered to negotiate on behalf of the Republican caucus. When pressed on why he wasn’t, Steel said Republicans were waiting for bipartisan negotiations.
Another GOP aide said only Boehner could negotiate with Democrats.
Bachus said he got a briefing late Thursday on McCain’s views from several of the candidate’s campaign advisers.
“McCain doesn’t want the $700 billion to go to a few Wall Street firms,” Bachus said.
Several senior Republicans said Bachus had advocated trying to work with Frank to try to revise the administration plan but was overruled by Cantor and other conservatives.
“I think a majority of our caucus supports the working group plan,” Bachus said.
Indeed, several senior House Republicans said they believed only perhaps one in five members of the caucus openly support the administration proposal. They said that at least a third of the caucus was strongly opposed and the rest was either leaning against or undecided.
Democrats are insisting that a large number of Republicans vote for the plan, which is unpopular with a large segment of the public.
“I don’t think you’ll see a plan that passes with only Democratic votes,” Frank said.
Rescue Plan Knocked Off Course
Presidential Politics
The role of the presidential candidates in the process was the subject of heated debate. McCain announced on Wednesday that he was suspending his campaign to return to Washington to work on the deal, and Democratic nominee Barack Obama followed after Bush invited him to the White House for the meeting.
McCain met with House Republicans in Boehner’s office at the end of the noon lunch hour. One of the participants said McCain seemed cool, if not opposed outright, to the administration plan and seemed to have a number of ideas of his own, such as limits on executive compensation and a reduction in the capital gains tax that could form the core of a GOP plan.
Some rank-and-file Republicans said they were investing a lot of hope in McCain’s involvement.
“I’m hoping we wait for John McCain to propose a plan the entire Republican caucus can get behind,” said Rep. Joe Pitts , R-Pa.
But after the White House meeting, Obama said, “When you inject presidential politics into delicate negotiations, it’s not necessarily as helpful as it needs to be.”
Late Thursday, the McCain campaign issued a statement saying that “despite today’s news reports, there never existed a ‘deal,’ but merely a proposal offered by a small, select group of members of Congress. As of right now, there exists only a series of principles, including greater oversight and measures to address CEO pay. However, these principles do not enjoy a consensus in Congress.”
The statement said McCain “did not attack any proposal or endorse any plan” at the White House meeting. “ John McCain simply urged that for any proposal to enjoy the confidence of the American people . . . all sides would have to cooperate and build a bipartisan consensus for a solution that protects taxpayers.”
McCain’s statement then blasted Democrats, saying they “allowed Senator Obama to run their side of the meeting. That did not work as the meeting quickly devolved into a contentious shouting match that did not seek to craft a bipartisan solution.”
Contentious Meeting
Aides to Pelosi said the Cabinet Room meeting was contentious.
“It was a strong exchange of ideas,” said Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami.
Not all of the opposition came from House Republicans.
Rescue Plan Knocked Off Course
Sen. Richard C. Shelby , R-Ala., top GOP member of the Senate Banking Committee, didn’t wait until the end of the session to voice his opinion. He came out long enough to tell reporters that there was “no agreement.”
“There’s still a lot of different opinions,” Shelby added. “Mine is it’s flawed from the beginning.”
The rest of the congressional participants in the meeting returned to Capitol Hill without making statements.
Even if congressional leaders come up with a bipartisan proposal, they are likely to have a tough time selling it to many rank-and-file members, and not only on the Republican side.
House Democrats held a heated caucus meeting Thursday morning in which some of their most liberal members made the case for additional measures in the credit crisis package, including more bankruptcy protection for homeowners facing foreclosure and a stock transaction fee to give the government more revenue to support troubled financial services companies.
Laura Tyson, a former Clinton administration official and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, argued against the fee idea at the caucus, saying she believed the government could recoup any funds it pays for troubled investments “deal by deal” by negotiating terms for financing rather than charging a fee on each transaction.
Pelosi also rebuffed any such step in the short term, although she said future measures may be needed to cover any losses the government ultimately suffers from the acquisition of troubled assets.
Republican lawmakers made it clear they were under significant pressure from constituents who regard the administration plan as a bailout for risk-taking Wall Street fat cats and an unprecedented government intrusion in the free market.
“I don’t think I’ve gotten one call or e-mail from a constituent supporting this,” said Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett , R-Md. “I’ve had two calls from businesspeople who say they just want a solution; they’re suffering because of the uncertainty.”
Cantor’s plan was targeted straight at the GOP anxiety.
“The essence of the plan is the recovery should not be funded by taxpayers who’ve been living by the rules, going to work every day, making their contributions to their 401(k)s and college savings plans,” he said. “It should be funded by Wall Street.”
The House Republican plan calls for “removing regulatory and tax barriers that are currently blocking private capital formation” and temporary suspension of dividend payments by financial institutions.
It also proposes requiring participating firms to disclose more information about their mortgage assets to the Treasury, barring government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from securitizing unsound mortgages, having the SEC audit reports of failed companies and review the performance of credit rating agencies, keeping executives from benefiting from taxpayer funding and creating a blue-ribbon panel to make recommendations to Congress on further reforms by Jan. 1, 2009.




Comments
The bailouts are a scam and I'm glad to see Senator Shelby taking a stand against them. The more that is learned about the bailouts, the less popular they become. Senator Schumer and Secretary Paulson have vested interests in the bailouts. Schumer's state of New York and Paulson's former employer Goldman Sachs will receive a lot of the free money. Unfortunately they have convinced President Bush of the need for the bailouts. In reality there is no need for them. Instead of rewarding wreckless investment companies with bailouts, we should just let them fail. I hope other legislators join Senator Shelby in his stand against the bailouts. No bailouts!
why is it that always the Democrats need to talk about bi-partizan when this administration has governed on their not even listening to the american public? Thanks Is time to stand up and dinounce the corruption!!
So, the Republicans try a last minute switcheroo, proposing legislation that is predictably conservative and helps no-one but the big spenders. Surprise, surprise! The Democrats look pretty flat-footed, and on the mainstream newscast face of it, so do the Republicans. Next week, I expect it will be different, with both sides ramping up the suspense till someone blinks. My prediction is that it will be business as usual, and little spenders like me will get the sharp end of the pineapple, while the scum floating on top will feed on the meat. What does it mean to be a Republican? My guess is it means next to nothing. Lower taxes, less government regulation, no big government. As if big business and big spenders don't enforce their own kind of big government, with barely even a pretence of voting the governers in or out, even for stockholders. The Republican Party is so desperate to win, to stay alive, they will take anyone who they think will get them votes. And then they are surprised when they have no ability to control their votes in the house? Their leaders don't lead, their followers don't follow. What does it mean to be a Republican? Sarah Palin can be a Republican, despite her views. She really ought to be running for the Alaska Seccessionist Party, or the Speed the Second Coming Party, or some other nutcake fringe group that wouldn't have a hope in hell of getting more than 18 votes. But of course she has enough rat cunning to ingratiate herself with the poor desperate GOP folks who see their organisation dying before their eyes, at the grass-roots level. The whole world is watching the slow-motion trainwreck that is the current US administration and Congress banging into an irritated electorate, hardly a month out from an overpriced, over-hyped two-man popularity contest which seems to convince lots of ordinary folks there's no point in voting at all for anyone, not even the dogcatcher. You cannot begin to imagine how dreary and stupid it all looks from where I live, in Australia. You cannot begin to imagine how dreary and stupid it looks to millions of people around the world. You are not alone, and people everywhere are watching you.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: