CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
Nov. 3, 2008 – 1:50 a.m.
Pennsylvania Voters Play Key Role in Future of Congress
By Greg Giroux, CQ Staff
Whether Democrats will make moderate or large gains in U.S. House elections on Tuesday will depend in no small part by how the voting plays out in Pennsylvania.
According to CQ Politics’ most recent projections, nine of Pennsylvania’s 19 districts are hosting highly or mildly competitive contests — tied with more-populous Florida for the most House races to watch in any state.
Here’s a look at the status of the nine Pennsylvania contests. Each is assigned one of three competitiveness ratings: “No Clear Favorite,” meaning the race is a toss-up; “Leans” Republican or Democratic, which indicates a highly competitive race in which the named party has only a narrow advantage; or Republican or Democrat “Favored,” meaning that the named party has a decisive advantage but that an upset by the other party’s candidate cannot be completely ruled out.
Republican-held districts where Democrats are posing serious or upset-minded challenges are listed first, followed by Democratic-held districts where Republicans have at least a reasonable chance of victory. More competitive districts are listed ahead of lesser-competitive districts.
Democratic Opportunities in Republican-Held Districts
• 3rd District (Northwest — Erie). Republican Rep. Phil English hasn’t been able to shake off Democratic challenger Kathy Dahlkemper, who has been running ahead of the congressman in some independent surveys. Dahlkemper has benefitted from an independent expenditure campaign from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the campaign arm of House Democrats that has attacked English on Social Security and trade issues.
English, in an written message Saturday to 3rd District residents, said that he was a “strong, independent voice for western Pennsylvania” who has worked for lower taxes and for fairness in U.S. trade agreements.
• 15th District (East — Allentown, Bethlehem). Republican Rep. Charles Dent is one of just eight Republicans in the House who represent districts that President Bush did not win in 2004. Dent has a reputation as a GOP centrist that Democratic challenger Siobhan “Sam” Bennett is trying to puncture. Bennett’s campaign got off to a slow start, and through Oct. 15 she had raised only half of what Dent took in for his entire campaign. Still, she’s a better candidate than the Democrat who took 43.5 percent of the vote against Dent in 2006. CQ Politics has an in-depth story on this race.
• 6th District (Southeast — part of Berks and Chester counties, Philadelphia suburbs). Gerlach is another one of the eight “Kerry Republicans” in the House. And like Dent, who represents an adjacent district, Gerlach is strongly favored to win on Tuesday. He’s highly likely to surpass the 51 percent vote share he amassed in all three of his previous House campaigns.
That this race isn’t in a nail-biter this year is in part to a rare failure in Democratic candidate recruitment. Democratic nominee Bob Roggio, a retired businessman, became the nominee after several better-known Democrats declined to challenge Gerlach. Roggio reported raising $619,000 through Oct. 15 — not enough to run a top-flight campaign in a Philadelphia-area district, and less than one-sixth the amount that 2006 Democratic nominee Lois Murphy raised for her entire campaign. Barack Obama is more likely than not to win Pennsylvania’s 6th, which could hold down Gerlach’s margin. But Gerlach for once shouldn’t have to stay up too late Tuesday to see if he’s been re-elected.
• 18th District (West — Pittsburgh suburbs, part of Washington and Westmoreland counties). Republican Rep. Tim Murphy didn’t face a top-flight opponent in 2006, when he took 58 percent of the vote against a little-known Democrat who spent $81,000. Democrats pounced on Murphy early in 2007-08 campaign cycle with allegations that aides in Murphy’s congressional office did campaign work on government time. But Democratic officials haven’t been talking up this race. The Democratic nominee, businessman Steve O’Donnell, hasn’t raised much money since winning a four-candidate primary in April.
Murphy aligns himself with the positions of labor unions more frequently than most House Republicans. He had a 71 percent score on the AFL-CIO’s legislative scorecard in 2007. His backing of a “card check” bill to ease union organizing was welcomed by organized labor but denounced by the conservative-leaning editorial page of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, which published a scathing editorial Thursday exhorting voters to reject Murphy at the polls.
Republican Opportunities in Democratic-Held Districts
Pennsylvania Voters Play Key Role in Future of Congress
• 11th District (Northeast — Scranton, Wilkes-Barre). Though his northeastern Pennsylvania district has a Democratic lean, 12-term Democratic Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski continues to be among the most politically endangered incumbents in either party. This is in part because of missteps by the congressman and in part because Republican nominee Lou Barletta, the mayor of Hazleton, has a national profile that is linked to his efforts to curb illegal immigration in his community.
Their biggest difference on issues is on the $700 billion financial rescue law that detractors called a taxpayer-financed “bailout.” Barletta opposed the measure, saying that Congress should have “looked at a private sector solution rather than using the taxpayers’ money.” And in a reference to Kanjorski’s tenure as chairman of the subcommittee that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Barletta said at a debate Oct. 29 that “we have a problem when members of Congress who sit on committees that are to oversee and regulate these institutions are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars of campaign contributions from the same industries that they are to regulate.”
Kanjorski said that “we had to act very precipitously and very quickly” on the advice of Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve chairman Ben S. Bernanke . He said at the Oct. 29 debate that he wanted to return to Congress to work with an Obama administration to make needed changes to education, health care and economic policy.
• 10th District (Northeast — Central Susquehanna Valley). Democratic Rep. Christopher Carney represents a vast, conservative-leaning swath of northeastern and central Pennsylvania, and he expected a vigorous challenge for the district he claimed two years ago from scandal-plagued Republican Rep. Don Sherwood.
But Carney merits the edge against Republican businessman Chris Hackett. Carney has touted his accessibility to constituents, saying he’s held 28 town hall meetings in 21 months, and his work to secure federal funding for smaller communities in his district. At a debate Thursday, Carney said that he has worked in a bipartisan fashion and secured Republican cosponsors to every piece of legislation he’s authored. “It’s working across the aisle that really makes a lot of sense,” Carney said.
Hackett, a certified public accountant, has emphasized fiscally conservative themes and takes an especially hard line against the appropriations projects known as “earmarks.” He’s accused Carney of not doing enough to curb fiscal profligacy in Congress. “Congressman Carney is an advocate for the pork-barrel spending system. I think it’s a corrupt system, and it’s bad for local taxpayers,” Hackett said at the debate.
• [@url12th District@http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=district-PA-12@] (Southwest — Johnstown). Democratic Rep. John P. Murtha , who’s seeking an 18th full term in the House, is pulling out all of the stops in the waning days of a re-election campaign that should have been a cakewalk but instead is a major struggle for the sixth most-senior House Democrat.
CQ Politics updated the race rating twice in the past week, moving the race from the uncompetitive “Safe Democratic” category to the mildly competitive “Democrat Favored” category and then to the highly competitive “Leans Democratic” category. The changes were made in light of an unexpectedly strong challenge from Republican nominee William Russell, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who only recently settled in Johnstown but has raised more than $2.8 million — much of it from small donors who responded to his direct-mail appeals.
Murtha in the past several years has increased his national profile — and irked conservative activists — as a vitriolic critic of the Bush administration’s policies in Iraq. Murtha also ran for House Majority Leader two year ago — after the Democrats won control of the House and with the support of incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi — but lost decisively to Maryland Rep. Steny H. Hoyer .
But Murtha’s political standing at home suffered in the aftermath of his comments two and a half weeks ago that western Pennsylvania is “a racist area.” A few days later, he explained his comments by saying that the region years ago was “really redneck.” By the congressman’s own admission, he appeared to take his re-election for granted until only recently.
“I was blindsided this time. It was my own fault. I take full responsibility and I’m worried that I waited too long to get people activated,” Murtha told campaign volunteers Saturday, according to an Associated Press story.
Murtha, a legendary member of the House Appropriations Committee and one of Congress’ most potent fundraisers, has raked in campaign cash in recent days and urged liberal organizations like MoveOn.org to assist him. Murtha plans to appear at a campaign event Monday afternoon in Johnstown with former President Bill Clinton. The DCCC has gotten involved in the race and spent nearly $600,000 in the district as of Saturday. Some of that money went to air an ad that accuses Russell of supporting a “privatization” of Social Security.
Sensing a potential upset, the National Republican Congressional Committee is airing an ad in the district that cites Murtha’s recent controversial comments as more evidence that he “has lost touch” after 34 years in office.
Pennsylvania Voters Play Key Role in Future of Congress
• 4th District (West — Pittsburgh suburbs). This rematch campaign between Democratic Rep. Jason Altmire and Republican former Rep. Melissa Hart, whom Altmire defeated in 2006, might have been close had the national political environment not been anti-Republican for the second consecutive election. But it is, and Altmire this time also has the benefits of incumbency that he lacked two years ago.
In their campaign two years ago, Hart spent $2.2 million and Altmire spent $1.1 million. Now it is Altmire with the 2-1 fundraising edge, with $2.7 million in receipts as of Oct. 15 compared to $1.3 million for Hart.
Hart can’t rely on help from the NRCC. And the DCCC hasn’t invested any money because it thinks Altmire is fairly secure in his bid for a second term.
• 8th District (Northern Philadelphia suburbs — Bucks County). Democratic Rep. Patrick J. Murphy is seeking a second term two years after narrowly unseating Republican Rep. Michael G. in district that is dominated by Bucks County north of Philadelphia and also includes small parts of northeastern Philadelphia and suburban Montgomery County.
This race is notable in part for the major candidates’ military backgrounds and personal ties to the ongoing Iraq War. Murphy, a former Army paratrooper, served in Iraq in 2003 and 2004. Manion is a retired Marine Corps colonel whose son was killed in Iraq last year while serving in that conflict.
At a debate Oct. 15, Murphy touted his support for creating “green collar” energy jobs in the district and noted that he voted against a Democratic-crafted budget bill on the grounds that it didn’t do enough to rein in spending. Manion criticized a “do-nothing Congress” and said Murphy sides too frequently with Democratic leaders and has exaggerated his fiscally conservative credentials.
But Murphy has the strong advantage, given the good political environment for Democrats and a strong fundraising effort that netted Murphy $3.7 million in receipts through Oct. 15, compared to $1 million for Manion. Neither party committee has spent independent expenditure funds in this district, which falls within the pricey Philadelphia media market.




Comments
I went to mass this Sunday before election day at a Church in Bishop Joseph Galanti's jurisdiction in southern New Jersey and the whole fifteen minute homely (sermon) was theological babble for "if you vote for the man who voted to leave babies resulting from an abortion to die on the operating table (Barack Obama) you will go to hell". Thankfully, Bishop Galanti's "horror video" was not shown. I am sure that I was not sitting in the only Catholic Church that presented this political announcement as a homily. Like many political announcements, the homily contained lies and scare tactics. It presented political party rhetoric and not the message of Christ. Barack Obama's position on abortion was misrepresented and there was no mention of starting unnecessary pre-emptive wars based on lies, torturing prisoners, tax policy that encourages greed and sends American jobs overseas, using fear of socialism as a scare tactic to eliminate government programs that help seniors and poor people to survive, and the other excesses of the current administation and it's heirs. Hopefully the people who were in the pews next to me do not have the mentality of 17th century peasants; and I hope that they will not vote the conscious and judgment of the leaders of the Catholic Church who brought us the child abuse cover up scandal rather than voting their own conscious, but one can never be sure. If the Catholic Church paid property and income taxes like other "political parties" some of the tax problems of older people who are losing their homes because of an unfair tax burden would be solved. The churches and the other properties that the Catholilc church would have to forfeit could be used to provide housing for people who have lost their homes in the credit crisis. This would be more in keeping with Christ's teaching
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: