CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
Updated Nov. 12, 2008 – 5:32 p.m.
Frank Drafting $25 Billion Auto Rescue Plan; GOP Senator Plans Fight
By Joseph J. Schatz, Benton Ives and Phil Mattingly, CQ Staff
The “Big Three” domestic automakers will take center stage on Capitol Hill next week as House Democrats push ahead with plans to give the ailing auto industry a $25 billion share of the Treasury Department’s financial bailout program despite ongoing reluctance from the Bush administration and signs that the plan may face a fight on the Senate floor.
Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina, a key Republican conservative, said Wednesday that he will oppose the bill, and an aide said the senator is preparing amendments. DeMint and other conservatives could stall the measure in a chamber that remains narrowly divided until new senators are sworn in next year.
“This is what happens when you bail out one industry: five more get in line. Some auto manufacturers are struggling because of a bad business structure with high unionized labor costs and burdensome federal regulations,” DeMint said in a statement. “Taxpayers did not create these problems and they should not be forced to pay for them.”
House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank , D-Mass., is drafting the legislation and said he will hold a hearing on the automakers’ plight Nov. 19. Frank said he expected President Bush, who has been reluctant to back the Democratic plan, to sign the legislation if Congress clears it.
“The consequences of a collapse of the American automobile industry would be particularly troubling,” Frank said. “If we could wait we wouldn’t have to do it next week.”
At the moment, Democrats appear to be on a collision course with the White House over the issue — and seem to be daring President Bush to acquiesce or preside over the possible demise of American car manufacturing giant General Motors Corp. during his final days in office. But it remains unclear how Democratic leaders will proceed.
While the Senate will be in session next week for a post-election lame duck session, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., has not yet formally called House members back to Washington, telling them that a decision will be made late this week. Pelosi has said she wants the president to commit to signing an economic stimulus package and the auto industry assistance — both of which the administration has been resisting — before the House acts.
Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi, said that the auto legislation could move independently of a stimulus package. The Bush administration, for its part, wants Congress to act on a trade agreement with Colombia, but Democrats appear dead set against that idea.
While the Big Three legislation is likely to garner support from many lawmakers, it also amounts to a reopening of the enormously controversial and hard-fought bailout program (PL 110-343) that congressional leaders rushed through last month. That could mean obstacles on the Senate floor.
Paulson: Look Elsewhere
At a news conference updating the status of Treasury’s $700 billion financial-industry rescue, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. called automobile manufacturing a “critical industry” and agreed the industry needs help. But he said the Treasury program probably was not the place to find it.
“We need a solution, but the solution has got to be one that leads to viability,” Paulson said. “The intent of the TARP was to deal with the financial industry.”
Instead, Paulson suggested Detroit look to $25 billion in loans activated by Congress (PL 110-329) in September, and said the administration was open go congressional changes to the program, which is being run out of the Energy Department.
Frank Drafting $25 Billion Auto Rescue Plan; GOP Senator Plans Fight
The hearing Frank will hold next week is likely to feature plenty of questions about how automakers would use money from the broader Treasury fund. Frank made it clear that the conditions in the direct-loan program Paulson cited — which require that the money be used to accomplish a shift to more fuel- efficient cars — will not be superseded by any new legislation.
“Those increased CAFE standards and the requirements . . . remain in place,” Frank said. “This is in addition to that.”
The office of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell , R-Ky., did not comment on Frank’s proposal, but it pointed to the bipartisan history of the existing loan program.
“It may be that there are changes that need to be made in order to expedite these low-interest loans,” Don Stewart, communications director for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell , R-Ky., said in a statement Wednesday. “Other ideas have been floated and all will receive a review as we approach the Senate’s return next week.”
Separately from Frank’s plan, Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski , D-Md., proposed legislation that would make interest payments on car loans, and sale and excise taxes paid on car purchases, tax-deductible for new cars purchased between Nov. 12, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2009.
Strings Attached
Frank, who termed the auto industry lifeline he is crafting a loan, said “we are trying very hard to come up with language — we want to protect the taxpayer to maximize the chances of repayment and . . . diminish the chances of the money being spent improvidently.”
The money for rescuing the auto companies would come from the already existing financial bailout fund. That fund is split into two disbursements of $350 billion, and Congress must approve the release of the second half.
With Treasury having spent the bulk of the first installment, Frank said the auto rescue bill will be written to avoid automatically releasing the second chunk of the bailout fund. He said it was important Congress have a chance to vote on the auto rescue as a separate issue.
“It would just be wrong to just take it out of the TARP without a separate vote authorizing that,” he said.
Sen. Charles E. Schumer , D-N.Y., agreed “there have to be some conditions attached to it. To me that’s more important than where it comes from, the way it is structured.”
“But I would have no problem with the money coming out of the TARP itself,” he said. “We might have to change the language of the TARP, but I would not have a problem with it.”
Schumer said lawmakers will need “an assurance they won’t come back for more money six months from now. They will actually improve their condition in the longer run as opposed to just biding time.”
Frank Drafting $25 Billion Auto Rescue Plan; GOP Senator Plans Fight
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino rejected the idea that President Bush would be held responsible if the administration derails the plan and the auto industry’s economic situation gets worse.
“People can blame the president of the United States for a lot of things and a lot of things land on his desk, but the state of the automakers right now is not the president of the United States’ fault,” she said.
First posted Nov. 12, 2008 12:01 p.m.




Comments
It depends on HOW a bailout is structured. BAILOUTS ARE COMPLEX BEASTS, but one should be implemented to save the U.S. Auto Industry. Try something outside the box like this - http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/11/solution-for-detroit-gm-friends.html Toyota and Honda also depend on the same suppliers who feed GM and FORD. No need to let "Detroit" disappear.
Just loaning automakers money is not going to save them. They have to have someone to sell their cars to. The population is out of money to buy goods and services. Too much of their income is going towards interest. Interest payments do not circulate in the economy and generate commerce. Let's hope that Paulson also puts a cap on the amount of interest that can be charged and that the Americans who get the credit buy American to keep the money here. These guys really don't know what they are doing and are just stumbling around in the dark. http://ewebsmith.com/gov/bellsoffreedom.html
Total Compensation Per Hour, 2007-2008 (includes wages and all benefits): Big Three automakers * $73.08 Toyota * $48.00 All workers * $28.48 Why should people getting $28.48 in wages and benefits have their tax money used to bail out people getting $73.08 in wages and benefits? The Big Three are failing because of poor management and greed by the UAW. In today's credit market, no on wants to loan the Big Three any serious money, because they may go bankrupt. A bail out will not change this. Unless the Big Three get wage and benefit cut reductions from the UAW, they will never compete in a global market. They, then, need capital to to add robots and automation to their factories. This will cause additional layoffs of UAW members. That is why the UAW have fought these changes. In order to complete globally, the Big Three need to have far fewer workers and more automation than their overseas competitors. They will never match the low wage advantage the overseas factories have. The UAW needs to bail out the Big Three, not the taxpayer. It is time for our government to bail out on bailouts. http://bloggingredneck.blogspot.com/
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: