CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
May 1, 2009 – 9:50 p.m.
With Specter, Women Democrats Let Anita Hill Bygones Be Bygones
By Kathleen Hunter, CQ Staff
In politics — as in life — time apparently heals all wounds.
Female Democratic senators who once used Sen. Arlen Specter ’s treatment of Anita Hill to fuel a feminist rallying cry have joined their male colleagues in welcoming the former Republican from Pennsylvania into their caucus last week, citing his work on behalf of women’s issues.
Specter’s aggressive questioning of Hill during Clarence Thomas ’ 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings earned Specter the nickname “Snarlin’ Arlen,” made him a prime target of women’s groups and helped usher a wave of women into Congress in 1992.
One of those women, Sen. Patty Murray , D-Wash., has said she was spurred to run for the Senate after watching the Thomas hearings, which took place before an all-male Judiciary Committee. Hill accused her former boss Thomas of sexual harassment — and Specter called her testimony “flat-out perjury.”
But Murray, who as conference secretary is now the top-ranking woman in the Senate Democratic leadership, says her view of Specter has changed.
“Obviously, when you work with somebody and you know that they go to work and fight for some of the same things you believe in, that reflects on how you feel about them,” Murray said. She cited Specter’s advocacy of the Violence Against Women Act and efforts to boost health funding as examples of issues on which they had worked together.
“I certainly know Arlen Specter from a lot of legislation that I’ve worked on with him since I’ve been here . . . and I respect him for that,” she said.
Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski , D-Md., who was one of just two women in the Senate when Thomas was confirmed, was highly critical of her male colleagues’ treatment of Hill, who Mikulski said was unfairly victimized. But, like Murray, Mikulski welcomed Specter into the Democratic fold, citing his efforts as an appropriator, having worked to greatly increase funding for the National Institutes of Health.
“There were many things — of course about the Anita Hill thing . . . but at the same time, there are many things that Sen. Specter has done to help women,” Mikulski said.
Still, women’s groups are nervous about Specter’s switch. Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women, said Specter is still “notorious among women’s rights advocates for his appalling treatment of Anita Hill.” Gandy said she had gotten a barrage of calls from NOW members since Specter’s announcement.
“They have very long memories,” she said.




Comments
I wonder which (side) would be less unpopular in the (supposedly) centrist-minded Keystone Stone - the (left-wing feminist) women's camp, as personified by Lynn Yeakel, or the (mindless tax-slashing) conservatives' camp, as personified by Patrick Toomey?
Maybe the Democratic women of the Senate are willing to forget and/or forgive, but I am willing to do neither. His treatment of Anita Hill was Specter at his smarmiest. At one point he actually told her that he had been a DA and that he knew perjury when he heard it, and that she had committed perjury. It was totally inappropriate and untrue, but there he was --carrying the water for the Grotesque Old Party. I despise him.
I would rather lose a senate advantage than accept that scumbag Specter into the party. His treatment of Hill can never be forgiven by anyone with integrity.
How can Blacks or weman forget how Specter treated Miss. Hill. Its going to be harder for me to vote for anything that would help him.
I am so happy to see that I am not the only person who remembers his 1991 performance. Hopefully the people of Pennsylvania have finally caught on to this man and will not re-elect him, regardless of party distinction.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: