CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– POLITICS
May 11, 2009 – 12:16 a.m.
Michigan Democrat Fights His District’s Freshman Curse
By Marc Rehmann and Derek Wallbank, CQ Staff
Freshman House Democrat Mark Schauer hopes his 2010 race breaks a negative streak in the congressional politics of Michigan’s 7th District. His two immediate predecessors lasted just two years in office before they were ousted by voters.
The good news for Schauer — the former leader of the state Senate’s Democratic minority — is that both of those one-term wonders were Republicans.
Joe Schwarz, a GOP moderate, won an open-seat race after defeating a crowded field of conservative rivals in the 2004 Republican primary. In 2006, he lost a one-on-one primary race with former state Rep. Tim Walberg, one of his 2004 primary opponents. But Walberg’s bruising challenge, backed by attacks against Schwarz by the conservative group Club for Growth, left such hard feelings that Walberg only narrowly defeated a little-known and underfinanced Democratic nominee.
That outcome set him up for his 2008 loss, by just more than 2 percentage points, to the better-known and experienced Schauer, who rode a national tide running in favor of the Democrats and portrayed Walberg as too conservative and too much a supporter of Bush’s unpopular administration.
The not-so-good news for Schauer is that he could face a 2010 rematch bid by Walberg in a district that, while no longer the Republican stronghold it once was, can hardly be described as safely Democratic.
The south-central Michigan district — made up of small cities such as Battle Creek and Jackson, exurbs of Lansing and Ann Arbor, and considerable rural turf — favored Democrat Barack Obama by 52 percent to 46 percent over Republican John McCain in the 2008 presidential contest. But the district went 54 percent to 45 percent for President George W. Bush over Democrat John Kerry just four years earlier.
Schauer, as he did in his 2008 House campaign, has attempted to portray himself as a pragmatic politician. But Walberg, in an interview with CQ Politics, hinted that he would try to turn the tables if he runs again in 2010 by casting Schauer as too apt to support President Obama’s agenda, which he views as too liberal.
“I’d never say never, but we are certainly looking at it,” Walberg said about the 2010 race. “I certainly have to be looking at it when you see what’s going on with this present administration, and the representative that’s there now following in lockstep.”
So far, no potential top-tier Republican challengers have entered the race, and it appears the party is giving Walberg the first right of refusal on a possible rematch.
“If I were a betting man, I would bet Walberg runs again,” said Saul Anuzis, former chairman of the Michigan Republican Party, who came third in the party’s race for Republican National Committee chairman won by Maryland’s Michael Steele earlier this year.
Walberg said that he is in no hurry to make a decision, and would not commit to a timetable. He did say, though, that if his answer is no, he’ll bow out in time for another Republican to be able to make a serious run against Schauer.
Another Republican being mentioned as a possible contender is lawyer Brad Smith, son of former Rep. Nick Smith, who left the seat open to retire in 2004. The younger Smith ran for his father’s seat in the 2004 Republican primary but came in second to Schwarz. Walberg finished third in that contest.
The 7th District was designed by a state legislature, then controlled by the Republicans, to prolong the House career of the elder Smith, and he won easily in the 2002 race that was the first within the current lines. But Smith’s 2004 decision to abide to a campaign promise of serving no more than a dozen years sparked the instability that ultimately resulted in the GOP ceding the seat.
The loss of this seat to the Democrats was a particular painful blow, as the 7th District city of Jackson was the site of the fabled 1854 “Under the Oaks” slavery abolition convention that helped launch the modern Republican Party.
And having lost the seat, the Republicans face no easy chore reclaiming it from Schauer, a well-seasoned candidate with strong fundraising skills.
Schauer outraised then-incumbent Walberg by $2.3 million to $2.1 million in the 2008 campaign cycle, and is off to a healthy start for 2010. He reportedly raised $389,000 in the year’s first quarter and, with some leftover money from his 2008 campaign, had nearly $451,000 in cash on hand as of March 31.
“My impression is that he is doing all of the things a good freshman ought to be doing,” said John Clark, a political science professor at Western Michigan University.
Schauer’s fundraising clout gained statewide exposure in late March, when the NCAA’s men’s basketball Final Four was held in nearby Detroit. Schauer bought two tickets for the final — which featured local favorite Michigan State University playing University of North Carolina — for just under $600, and then donated them for a campaign fundraising raffle. Schauer also bought two tickets of his own to cheer for Michigan State, where he earned his M.A. in political science, though his Spartans lost to North Carolina’s favored Tarheels.
But Republicans are not waiting until next year’s campaign to blast Schauer’s freshman-term record, including his support in February for Obama’s $787 billion economic stimulus package and a $410 billion catchall spending bill that concluded a fiscal 2009 appropriations process that stalled last year before either Obama or Schauer took office.
In April, 7th District voters started receiving “robocalls” from the National Republican Congressional Committee, the House Republicans’ campaign arm, an early sign that the party is focused on unseating Schauer.
Jennifer Hoff, communications director for the Michigan Republican Party, said that every time Schauer supports the policies of Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, “He is voting to hurt Michigan families, who are ready to have someone stand up for them.”
Schauer dismisses such criticism, noting that district residents have been hurt by a deep and long-lasting recession that has given Michigan the highest state unemployment rate and has the pivotal auto manufacturing industry fighting to stave off financial disaster. Schauer portrays the measures that Republicans are attacking as necessary to provide government assistance to individuals and businesses that are in need.
He also says his positions on the Agriculture Committee, the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and the latter panel’s Highways and Transit Subcommittee, have him well-placed to pursue aid for his district.
“What I support is an economic policy that is going to dig our way out of a deeper recession,” Schauer said. “My constituents are very fearful. I think what the Republicans play on is that fear, without offering any solution whatsoever or more of the same that has led to 600,000 job losses a year.”




Comments
Well now, if and WHEN the Republican Party joins the Whig Party in the history books, another convention would seem to be in order - only this time...
This is not a traditional swing district; conservative but moderate, open minded district. Actually, that wouldn't describe it very well at all. Some parts, like Battle Creek, the population center, are like that, if not slightly Democratic leaning, (it's also where Schauer has his base), but the district is split up between some solidly conservative areas and some more moderate to Democratic areas, that's partly why Schauer's 2008 win was so narrow. But there's another, odd reason why his win was narrow; one, because Wahlberg was then the incumbent and that comes with a certain degree of entrenchment and the couple of pre-election scandals that nearly rocked Wahlberg to huge upset in 2006 had blown over. But most importantly of all was the decision of the state and national Republican party to try and save him. It was perplexing. Knollenburg was left to the dogs, as were several other districts, but they really threw in some big guns to try to save Wahlberg. The problem is Wahlberg is very conservative and often very adamant in his religious beliefs. I've heard him described by one, moderate Lutheran who lives in the district, (and his house district to be specific and knew him somewhat), as a "Christian Taliban". Wahlberg is an ardent, hardright, reactionary conservative backed by such out-of-the-mainstream groups like the CfG. His view are in no way in line with a swing district and if the GOP thinks he is their best candidate over a more moderate to conservative Republican like Schwartz who tend to fit this district very well, then by all means as a Democrat I hope they do it because Schauer won't lose, (except in a horrendous environment), to someone like Wahlberg. This is really Schauer's cycle he has to worry the most. Its a fairly tough district that might have been won by McCain if McCain had not written Michigan off early. I suspect that in 2010 the GOP gerrymander will be undone for a bipartisan incumbent protection plan, (which is why Dems are going after McCotter this year after he barely beat back unfunded, unheralded challengers two cycles in a row), and under it I expect to see a Lansing-Battle Creek based district that would be very well tailored for Schauer, and at the same time protects Mike Rogers who district definitely swung Democratic and was always a swing district to say the least.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: