CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
May 20, 2009 – 12:14 a.m.
Gitmo Dominates War Funding Debate
By Josh Rogin, CQ Staff
As the Senate heads into its second day of debate over the war funding bill, the fate of Guantánamo detainees still tops the list of issues on senators’ minds and tongues.
Senate Democratic leaders on Tuesday tried to head off a contentious and lengthy discussion over what to do with the prisoners by agreeing to remove $80 million in their bill (
James M. Inhofe , R-Okla., who had planned to offer a similar amendment, endorsed Inouye’s language, as did several other Republicans.
“That will pretty much accomplish what I wanted to accomplish,” said Inhofe.
But Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell , R-Ky., wasted no time in coming up with another Guantánamo amendment, ensuring that the issue will continue to be debated as consideration of the second fiscal 2009 supplemental spending bill resumes Wednesday.
McConnell’s amendment would require the administration to report to Congress a threat assessment of each of the about 240 prisoners now held at Guantánamo, and justify any detainee transfers that might come ahead of the assessments.
“This is a simple amendment that reflects the concerns of Americans about the danger of releasing terrorists either here or in their home countries, where they could then return to the fight,” McConnell said.
Regardless of whether the McConnell amendment is adopted, his effort further imperils the chance that the supplemental bill, which totals $91.3 billion in the Senate version, could reach President Obama’s desk before the Memorial Day recess.
“We hope to complete the legislation this week in the Senate,” said a Senate leadership aide. “But I think it is unlikely that we will have a conference completed on the bill before the end of this work period.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , D-Nev., filed a motion Tuesday evening to invoke cloture and cut off debate on the measure. A vote on cloture would come Thursday.
Obama is expected to call for quick passage of the bill during a speech regarding his plans for Guantánamo on Thursday. The House passed its $96.7 billion version (
Tuesday’s entire floor debate centered on the Guantánamo detainee issue.
Reid went to great pains to defend the Democrats’ decision to strip the Guantánamo-related money and assure the nation that there is no plan to release any of its prisoners in American communities.
“Democrats under no circumstances will move forward without a comprehensive, responsible plan from the president,” said Reid. “We will never allow terrorists to be released into the United States.”
Carl Levin , D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said money to close the prisons could be included in the regular fiscal 2010 appropriations bills, with little or no detriment to the president’s proposal to shutter the prisons by early next year.
Not all Democrats were happy with the move. Tom Harkin , D-Iowa, said the funds should be made available now.
“I’ll tell you what, I’m not going to wait until October,” he said, offering no further elaboration on his plans.
But what is clear is that Senate Republicans see the supplemental debate as a forum to discuss the larger issues associated with the president’s plan to reorient the detainee policies established shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.
“The numerous unresolved questions include where the Guantánamo inmates will be held and tried, how we will handle those who cannot be tried but are too dangerous to release and how we will deal with the prisoners held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan,” said John McCain , R-Ariz.
The Obama administration “announced the closure with fanfare and a lot of publicity but no overall comprehensive policy to address the issue,” McCain said. “And now they are paying the price.”
Bart Jansen contributed to this story.




Comments
The Democratic Congress and Senate should be more concerned about ending the wars that they promised to end if elected. They should be more concerned about the American boys and girls that are being killed,. maimed, and tortured as a result of an illegal act of aggression while being bullied by commanders who deserve no respect to the point of fratricide. http://ewebsmith.com/gov/notending.html
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: