CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
Updated June 17, 2009 – 1:06 p.m.
Democrats Lose Ground in Health Care Debate
By Alex Wayne, CQ Staff
Senate Democrats have been knocked off balance in their push for a health care overhaul, stalled by controversy over the plan’s cost, criticism of its limited impact, and the absence of their leader on the issue, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy .
The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Wednesday began writing legislation intended to solve the problem of the nation’s 46 million uninsured and reduce the growth of health spending. Ideally, Democrats thought, they would even have some bipartisan support for the bill.
But instead, the session began with withering criticism from Republicans who blasted both the cost estimates of the bill and the fact it had many incomplete sections.
“When are we going to have cost estimates?” asked Sen. John McCain , R-Ariz. “This is the most incredible markup I’ve ever been in my entire time at the United States Senate.” McCain called it “a joke.”
“How do you mark up a bill that you don’t know how much it costs when you’re trying to amend the bill because you’re concerned about costs?” asked Sen. Judd Gregg , R-N.H.
The last 24 hours have seen a barrage of criticism from Republicans over a preliminary cost estimate for the Democrats’ starter bill.
The cost estimate, called a “score” by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), said portions of the measure would cost $1 trillion over 10 years, while accomplishing only a modest increase in insurance coverage. More than 30 million people would remain uninsured if the bill were enacted, CBO estimated, although the agency cautioned that it had not examined other proposals to expand coverage, including an expansion of Medicaid, the health entitlement for the poor, or a new government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurance.
Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. said all would be solved in the coming weeks. “We have to start the process, that’s my view, and that’s why we’re here today,” Dodd said. “We’ve left certain sections open because they’re controversial,” he said.
Dodd has been left in charge of the bill by Kennedy, the committee’s chairman, who is being treated for brain cancer.
Kennedy had been counted on to be the Democratic’s pivotal player in pushing forward the health care overhaul and his absence from the Capitol was never more apparent than on Tuesday, as Democrats scrambled with uneven results to rebut the GOP criticism and prepare for the committee to begin voting on amendments to the initial version of the bill.
Democrats and their allies said the Republican criticism was off-target, because the CBO score was based on a June 9 draft of the Kennedy bill not the current version. By the time it is finished, they promised, the bill would meet the goals the party and President Obama had set for themselves.
Democrats’ defense of the bill amounted to a plea for patience, noting that it is incomplete and likely to be significantly altered over the next week.
The Senate Finance Committee is also involved in the process of developing health care legislation and its chairman, Sen. Max Baucus , D-Mont., had planned to release his own draft of a bill this week. But he has also been trying to keep the total cost below $1 trillion over 10 years and court Republicans, both tasks that may take more time.
In the House, Democratic leaders announced plans to release their own version of an overhaul later this week and hold hearings on it next week; they have provided only a brief outline of its contents.
Kennedy’s Starting Point
Kennedy’s bill would set up a system of state-run “gateways” to help people without health insurance shop for it. Anyone earning less than five times the poverty level — about $110,000 for a family of four, this year — would be eligible for federal subsidies to help pay their premiums.
The bill would impose new regulations on the insurance industry, forbidding them from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions, limiting their profits, and limiting variations in premiums due to age, health status, gender, and occupation, among other requirements.
Greg Vadala and John Reichard contributed to this story.
First posted June 17, 2009 12:04 a.m.




Comments
Of course they will lose ground because Obama cannot be trusted. I'm not talking about "conservatives" or "republicans" I'm talking about Democrats. Obama is not qualified to be president. We would not be in this mess if Hillary or even McCain was in the White House right now.
Any Democrat who expects any republican to act in a responsible bi-partisan way to the benefit of the American people is a fool.
The headline is pure tabloid. The Republican lie machine has been hard at work carrying water for the health care profiteers. No one who knows anything thinks that the Finance Committee version will be etched in stone, just as the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee version will not be , and those are just the Senate versions. If the Senators are upset by the cost, just think, without health care reform the cost to our economy will be much more than a trillion dollars. We are on a trajectory to be spending 20% of our GDP on health care by 2020. These bills deserve careful, even meticulous evaluation before they are presented. There are a multitude of vital questions that must be addressed before a final version is ready for the public. The rethugs want it out so they can tear it down sooner rather than later. I would tell them that when they when they are ready to make constructive criticisms the democrats would listen. In the meantime they are irrelevant.
Puma, you hit the nail on the head. By chance, I just had this conversation yesterday with my mother in Florida, a lifelong democrat. She voted for Obama because she couldn't stand Hillary. Now look what he's doing. A trillion here, a trillion there. After 5 months in office, neither of us can believe there was a time when we thought Obama was better than Hillary. We won't be fooled again.
Initially, in 1966, Medicare cost $3 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee estimated that Medicare would cost only about $ 12 billion by 1990 (including inflation). However, in 1990 Medicare actually cost $107 billion. The President's 2009 budget estimates current Medicare net outlaysof $413 billion in FY2009. This $1 trillion estimate for the new health care plan is just ridiculously low. As more people abandon their private insurance policies and as the benefits expand to meet the political demands on the system look for an annual budget of this plan to approach a trillion dollars a year! derekcrane
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: