CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
Aug. 20, 2009 – 10:36 a.m.
Kennedy Seeks Rule Change for Appointing His Successor
By Bart Jansen, CQ Staff
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy , who is battling brain cancer, has asked Democratic Massachusetts leaders to change state law so that his successor could be appointed rather than wait five months for a special election.
The timeliness of his successor could be important to votes on health care, climate change and other significant legislation pending this fall.
As reported Thursday by the Boston Globe, Kennedy this week sent Gov. Deval Patrick , state Senate President Therese Murray and state House Speaker Robert DeLeo a letter dated July 2 asking them to change the law for a temporary gubernatorial appointment until a special election is held.
Kennedy specifically said the governor should obtain a commitment from the appointee to serve temporarily and not participate in the special election, to ensure a fair contest.
“The senator had planned to deliver the letter at some point in the future, but decided to deliver it this week to avoid the potential of his and others’ conversations about a change in the law leaking to the press without his views being publicly known,” said spokesman Anthony Coley.
“He’s hopeful that when the legislature returns in September, the governor and leaders in the statehouse can work together to change the law through the regular course of legislative business to close that ‘gap in representation,’ ” Coley said.
Senate Democrats and the two independents who align with them control 60 votes — enough to overcome a filibuster — but the continued absence of Kennedy and ailing 91-year-old Sen. Robert C. Byrd , D-W.Va., means that they are unable to reach that number.
When asked about the importance of Kennedy’s continued absence, a Democratic aide replied, “With an agenda full of important issues like health insurance reform, energy and climate change legislation and countless others, it’s always important have enough votes to overcome Republican filibusters.”
So far this year, Kennedy has voted on nine of 270 Senate roll call votes, most recently on April 27 to invoke cloture on a bill (
Changing State Law
In most states, the governor is authorized to appoint an interim senator when a vacancy occurs, with an election for the seat held on the next regularly scheduled congressional election day. That contest would either be the regularly scheduled election for a full term, if the departed senator’s term is expiring, or a special election to fill out the remaining years of the unexpired term.
The Massachusetts law was changed in 2004 because of the prospect that Republican Gov. Mitt Romney might appoint the successor to Democratic Sen. John Kerry , who was then running for president
Now the law calls for a special election to be held within 145 to 160 days after the seat becomes vacant.
“I am now writing you about an issue that concerns me deeply — the continuity of representation for Massachusetts should a Senate vacancy occur,” Kennedy wrote. “I strongly support that law and the principle that the people should elect their senator; I also believe it is vital for this commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election.”
Republicans were quick to object. Brian Walsh, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said that while the NRSC supports a special election, it was inappropriate to change the law again.
“It is hard to see how the Democrats wouldn’t pay a political price for changing their Senate succession law again to meet a new political purpose,” Walsh added. “The integrity of this process already took a hit when the Democrats made the blatant power play to take this authority away from Gov. Romney, and it’s hard to see how they would have the credibility to reverse themselves simply because it’s now politically inconvenient. This should not be about partisan politics – it should be about ensuring the integrity and credibility of the Senate selection process.”
A spokesman for the governor declined Thursday to comment on Kennedy’s plea. In a statement, the governor said only, “It’s typical of Ted Kennedy to be thinking ahead, and about the people of Massachusetts, when the rest of us are thinking about him. Diane and I continue to pray for the restoration of the senator’s health and the comfort of his family.”
Kennedy’s brain tumor was discovered in May 2008, and he has been absent from the Senate for most the time since then, though he consults regularly with his close friend, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd , D-Conn., on health legislation that Dodd shepherded through the committee that Kennedy chairs — Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.
Coley said the letter reflected Kennedy’s concern for succession should a vacancy occur, but that it didn’t represent a change in his condition.
“As he had done throughout his 47 years representing the people of Massachusetts, the senator has been thinking about the future and what best serves the state’s interests,” Coley said.
“The senator drafted this letter because he is thinking about the future and what best serves the interests of the state. Whether it’s working last summer to lay the groundwork for health care reform or fighting for resources for the state for economic recovery, school repairs or infrastructure work, every day for the last 47 years the senator has looked ahead to determine how best to serve the people of Massachusetts. This is no different.”
Kathleen Hunter contributed to this story.




Comments
No Ted...we are not changing the rules for you, No Ted we are not appointing one of your nephews or another Kennedy, No Ted we are not nationalizing Mass. healthcare which has been a disaster. No Ted, No Ted, No Ted.
So glad this man respects democracy and the ability for us to even elect our own representatives in Congress.
Ted Kennedy, class act to end. It shouldn't be surprising that he is so aware of his mortality, given the fate of his three brothers, but it is still refreshing to see a public servant so committed to a cause that he is willing to, essentially, advertise that his life is near its end. Senator Kennedy, god bless you.
In spite of the highest annual health plan cost per employee, the revolutionary mandatory-coverage plan in Massachusetts was enacted in 2006 and more than 97% of all Massachusetts residents are now covered -- whereas nationally some 40% of Americans have no health insurance. Even though the state is suffering financially due to the highest premiums, without the affordable public option and removing all kinds of wastes etc, it achieved near universal health program. I think now is the time to consider sustainable power for Now and the Future as time does not fix energy depletion.
Isn't this a little premature? What if they change the law and Sen. Kennedy happens to stay in office for another couple years and by then, based on Gov. Patrick's approval ratings, a Republican may be in the governor's office in Mass. Then the legislature will have to go back and re-change the law to what it was under Gov. Romney. It's tough using the law for partisan purposes.
This is what happens when you have a totalitarian one-party state. They should change the law to state that, "Only in the case of the Governor being a Democrat (Bolshevik really), can a successor be appointed". That would solve the problem once and for all. These guys in the Bay State need to look to "Uncle Joe" as an example (and I don't mean Cannon). He knew how to run things with an iron fist (not to mention a hammer and sickle).
1. What was Senator Kennedy's public position back in '03-'04 when his state's legislature passed the current law? 2. Did it occur to ANYONE in the MA D Caucus (in either chamber) to change only the extent of eligibility for interim appointment, namely that the governor may select only someone from the same party as that of the most recent elected occupant of the seat, a la WY in '07, rather than revoking such power altogether?
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: