CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– FOREIGN POLICY
Sept. 22, 2009 – 5:17 p.m.
Conservatives Cast Obama as ‘Reluctant, Timid’
By Caitlin Webber, CQ Staff
In a preview of campaign refrains to come, prominent conservatives are saying President Obama’s foreign policy is hurting our allies and helping our enemies.
The “Obama as Carter” motif dominated the conservative Foreign Policy Institute’s annual conference, held in Washington Monday and Tuesday, with GOP headliners making unflattering comparisons to the 39th president to warn of a decline in U.S. international standing.
Obama’s stance on the presidential crisis in Honduras, willingness to engage Iran in nuclear talks and decision to scrap the Bush administration’s missile defense plans in Eastern Europe were popular targets.
“I think the president is communicating he is a reluctant and timid defender of freedom . . . time and time again,” said former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a 2008 Republican presidential contender and a leading potential candidate in 2012.
“Neutrality has an inevitable corollary . . . you draw more close to your foes and create distances from your friends,” Romney said.
Speakers were nearly unanimous in criticizing Obama’s recently espoused skepticism about a troop build-up in Afghanistan.
“We are in the second Carter administration,” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga. (1979-99). “Obama is dangerously close to the ‘malaise’ speech,’” referring to Carter’s 1979 speech in which he described a national “crisis of confidence.”
Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl , R-Ariz., said reversing plans to guard against intercontinental ballistic missiles with interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic projected weakness to Russia and Iran.
“Conceding to Russian demands in Eastern Europe is hardly the way to convince Iran we’re serious” about the consequences of failed nuclear talks, Kyl said.
And, he said “we did everything wrong if we wanted to send a signal that [Russia] shouldn’t even think about extending influence over our NATO allies.”
Kyl also said that he would be willing to support a renegotiated Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with cuts in the U.S. nuclear arsenal if the administration agreed to “modernize” the remaining stockpile and ensure its reliability.
But on ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, another pillar of Obama’s nonproliferation strategy, Kyl said he wouldn’t budge.
“I will lead the charge against it and I will do everything in my power to see that it is defeated,” he said. That’s no empty threat from Kyl, who led the successful opposition to ratification when the treaty was brought to the Senate in 1999.
McCain Goes Own Way
If there was one Republican figure not exactly on-message during the two-day event, it was, not surprisingly, Kyl’s Arizona colleague and the party’s 2008 presidential standard bearer.
Reflecting his maverick senatorial image more than his combative presidential campaign persona, John McCain ’s criticism of the Obama administration was more muted than that delivered by some of the other speakers.
When asked if he believed if the United States was poised for a decline in international status, McCain said, “I believe we will retain our position as a predominant power in the world.”
On Iran, he allowed that Obama was simply doing what he said he would do — direct talks with Tehran with the goal of ending its uranium enrichment program — and that failure would have a price for the Islamic Republic.
“I think the administration is doing what President Obama said he would do in the campaign,” McCain said. “And I’d say if the president fails to reverse [Iran’s] position on its nuclear program, sanctions may be the next step.”




Comments
Obama as Carter???? WTF are these teabaggers thinking? or are they even thinking??? People (read voters) want answers to their issues, and a government that is trying to solve problems, not dredging up crap from the 70's This is exactly why I stopped voting for the GOP. NO answers, only mud slinging.
Branding Democratic Presidents as timid and reluctant is standard GOP rhetoric. You would think they would at least update their complaints to fit the subject's personality. But let's take a moment to look at some facts: the conservative over-reliance on force has resulted in outright defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan. The conservatives' policy of supporting a military dictatorship in Pakistan has pushed that country to the brink of civil war. Militarily the conservative record is three at bats and three strike outs. In terms of trade relations with foreign countries, the conservative record is worse yet- millions of high paying long-term American jobs shipped overseas. Continued dependence on Arabian oil sheiks for our basic energy needs, and a recession precipitated by devaluing the dollar on international credit markets. The GOP record on foreign affairs is so dismally unsccessful that only full blown amnesiacs could possibly take them seriously,.
Senator Kyl opposes the test-ban treaty, so he apparently wants the United States to have more nuclear weapons. Why? Even though the Cold War is long over, we can still destroy the world many times over. The United States should be reducing, not increasing, it's nuclear stockpile. It's rather hypocritical for the U.S. to be telling countries they can't have nuclear capability, when we refuse to reduce--if not eliminate ours.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: