CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
– CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS
Oct. 7, 2009 – 2:18 p.m.
Despite Defections, Democrats Derail Minority’s Bid to Push Aside Rangel
By Alan K. Ota, CQ Staff
Despite the first tiny glimmer of a centrist revolt, House Democrats on Wednesday quashed a GOP bid to force Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel to step aside until an ethics probe is resolved.
The House voted, 246-153, to refer to the ethics committee — and effectively kill — a GOP privileged resolution (
Two Democrats from Mississippi, Gene Taylor and Travis W. Childers , voted with Republicans in opposing the referral. Democrats Gene Green of Texas and Mike Quigley of Illinois voted “present,” as did 17 other lawmakers, including nine of the 10 ethics panel members (Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren , D-Calif., did not vote).
Republicans said they believed their attacks on Rangel were gaining traction. There were no similar Democratic defections Feb. 10 when the House voted along party lines, 242-157, to table a similar measure (
The ouster resolution was sponsored by John Carter of Texas, who serves as secretary of the House Republican Conference.
“We cannot tolerate a double standard in this country, one for the common man and another for the rich and powerful,” said Carter, a former state judge. “To allow Mr. Rangel to continue to serve as chairman . . . sends a clear message to the American public that this government refuses to abide by the same laws they impose on the working people of this country.”
No ‘Subjective Comment’ From Rangel
Rangel, D-N.Y., took a front-row seat in the well of the House and listened to the reading of the GOP resolution with his chin perched in one hand. He left the chamber as the voting began.
“All I can say is I voted for the motion,” Rangel said. “I been waiting patiently for the ethics committee to make a judgment. That’s where it belongs. It doesn’t belong on the floor.”
He declined to criticize the ethics panel. “I don’t want to make any subjective comment,” he said. “Naturally, it’s a thing that bothers me and my family. That’s enough comment.”
Taylor said he broke ranks to vote against referral of the resolution because of concern about the delayed conclusion of the investigation of Rangel that began last year. “The ethics committee has worked on this for months. . . . He should step aside,” Taylor said.
Democratic leaders such as Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, an assistant to Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, defended the ethics committee and said there was strong support among Democrats for letting the panel complete its work before taking any action against Rangel.
“We all want the ethics committee to act expeditiously,” Van Hollen said. “This is in the purview of the ethics committee right now.”
The weakening of Democratic support for Rangel came after revelations in August that he had not reported an additional $500,000 or more in assets on financial disclosure forms. The disclosures added to a list of potential problems under review by the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.
In July 2008, Rangel responded to a series of critical news articles by requesting an ethics review of omissions in his financial disclosure forms, benefits from four rent-subsidized apartments in New York and his use of official letterhead to solicit funds for the Charles B. Rangel School of Public Service at the City University of New York.
Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland took a lead role in trying to head off action against Rangel before the ethics panel completes its investigation.
But House Minority Leader John A. Boehner , R-Ohio, backed Carter’s call for Rangel to step aside.
“Today’s vote is just the latest example of Speaker Pelosi breaking her promise to have the most ‘open and ethical’ Congress in history,” Boehner said in a statement after the vote. “Instead of holding Chairman Rangel accountable for his actions, House Democrats are once again circling the wagons and demonstrating their loyalty to a leader who faces serious questions about his official conduct.”




POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: