CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
– POLITICS
April 15, 2008 – 4:37 p.m.
Republican Objections Derail Paper-Ballot Reimbursement Bill for Now
By Molly K. Hooper, CQ Staff
Republican opposition led to the defeat Tuesday of a bill offering federal help to localities that don’t trust their electronic voting machines.
The bill (
Democrats put the bill on the part of Tuesday’s calendar used for noncontroversial measures. It was brought up under suspension of the rules, which requires a two-thirds vote for passage.
The final tally, 239-178, fell far short of the margin needed.
Democrats have other options for moving the bill through the House.
They could take the measure to the Rules Committee and return it to the floor under a regular order. Then it would need only a simple majority to pass, though opponents would still have some procedural options with which to try to thwart the bill’s progress.
After the vote, Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer indicated that the measure was not likely to see further action in the House.
Hoyer, D-Md., said the measure would die in the Senate even if House Democrats brought the bill back using different procedures.
Numerous GOP House members opposed the bill because of its high price tag, said Vernon J. Ehlers of Michigan, ranking Republican on the House Administration Committee.
The Congressional Budget Office released its estimate of the bill’s cost — as much as $685 million — after the committee had approved the bill by voice vote April 2.
Democrats countered that their minority-party colleagues knew the cost was likely to exceed $600 million when they supported the bill in committee.
Ehlers said he had hoped to be able to negotiate changes to the bill.
“I supported it out of committee because I thought it should reach the floor for floor debate,” he said. “I anticipated it would be taken up under a rule where we might have possibility for additional compromise, but that has not happened.”
Republican Objections Derail Paper-Ballot Reimbursement Bill for Now
The White House strongly opposed the bill, saying “it would create a new program that is largely redundant with existing law, and therefore unnecessary,” but did not threaten a veto.
The bill would authorize one-time-only funding to set up paper-ballot-counting systems or to retrofit printers onto electronic voting machines before the general election.
It would also authorize federal reimbursements for hand counts and manual audits of this year’s election results.




Comments
Democracy is too expensive for Republicons? Too risky for their candidates' races? What else are we to think?
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: