CQ TODAY PRINT EDITION
– BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES
July 10, 2008 – 12:41 p.m.
Senators Poised to Ship Housing Package Back Across Capitol Hill
By Benton Ives, CQ Staff
Congress moved forward with a massive housing package Thursday, but lawmakers still have a handful of outstanding issues to iron out before they can clear the bill.
The Senate is expected to volley the package (
On Thursday, senators voted, 84-12, to invoke cloture on a portion of the bill, which was the last major procedural vote necessary before sending the legislation back to the House.
An effort by John Ensign , R-Nev., to attach an $8.2 billion package of energy tax break extenders, which had been holding up the bill, came up short, as an overwhelming majority of senators repeatedly voted to move forward without Ensign’s amendment.
The two chambers remain in broad agreement over the measure’s core provisions: a major regulatory overhaul of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a modernization of the Federal Housing Administration and a $300 billion expansion of the FHA’s loan insurance programs aimed at helping borrowers avoid foreclosure.
The legislation also includes a $14.5 billion housing-focused tax package.
But the two chambers have to sort out several differences, including finding offsets for the tax package, the effective date for Fannie’s and Freddie’s new regulator and billions in grants for states to rehabilitate foreclosed properties.
|
|
||
|
House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank , D-Mass., will now try to shepherd the bill through the House floor. On Thursday, he said the measure could come up as early as next week, though consideration could slip into the week of July 21.
While the bill slogged through the Senate, Frank and Senate Banking Chairman Christopher J. Dodd , D-Conn., continued negotiations on the package. Frank is hoping that “what we send them they will accept,” to avoid another round of pingponging the bill between the chambers.
Action on the bill comes amid continued bad news in the housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac share prices plunged Thursday amid continued concern over their solvency. On Capitol Hill, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. assured lawmakers, “Their regulator has made clear that they are adequately capitalized.”
Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, appearing at a Financial Services hearing, pressed for further regulatory powers to respond to the housing crisis and the larger problems it exposed in the financial markets, but acknowledged congressional action beyond the housing bill was unlikely this year.
“In the longer term . . . legislation may be needed to provide a more robust framework for prudential supervision of investment banks and other large securities dealers,” Bernanke said.
Senators Poised to Ship Housing Package Back Across Capitol Hill
“Obviously, we’d like to have additional tools. But these are very complex matters. . . . So my hope would be that the Congress would begin soon to think hard about these issues.”
Frank wants to delay the effective date for the new Fannie-Freddie regulator the housing bill would create. The House measure includes a six-month delay, while the new regulator would start immediately after enactment under the Senate bill.
Frank is worried that the new official would start quickly promulgating regulations and cause chaos for Fannie and Freddie.
Conforming loan limits, which govern the size of mortgages Fannie and Freddie can buy, also remain an issue. The Senate measure would set that limit at $625,000 in high-cost areas, but Frank would like to tweak that provision to make it more expansive.
Frank also said he had concerns about language in the Senate bill that could require Fannie and Freddie to package more home loans into securities rather than holding them on their balance sheet.
The Senate measure also includes $3.9 billion in Community Development Block Grants for states and localities to purchase and rehabilitate foreclosed properties.
The White House has vehemently objected to the grant money, threatening to veto the bill, while moderate House Democrats have raised concerns about not paying for the program’s expense.
Frank opted to drop that money from the earlier House version of the bill. He said it might also have to be excised from the latest package, provided House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., offers a “commitment that [the grant money] goes into another bill with pay-fors.”
On Thursday, Dodd said the grant program would stay in the Senate’s version of the bill for now, but acknowledged that “it may come out” later.
House tax writers also are also expected to find offsets or cost reductions to pay for a $2.4 billion shortfall in the Senate’s tax package.
Richard Rubin contributed to this story.




POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: