CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
– CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS
Updated Nov. 19, 2008 – 2:28 p.m.
Democratic Steering Panel Chooses Waxman Over Dingell
By Jonathan Allen and Coral Davenport, CQ Staff
The House Democratic Steering Committee has nominated Henry A. Waxman to be chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee next year — a stinging rebuke of the sitting chairman, John D. Dingell .
Waxman won a 25-22 vote over Dingell in a closed-door meeting of the Steering panel on Wednesday. Because Dingell got more than 13 votes in the secret balloting, he can be nominated to run against Waxman at Thursday’s Democratic Caucus meeting, at which all of the Democrats elected to the 111th Congress are eligible to vote.
Waxman 69, currently chairs the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He has used his position to conduct aggressive investigations of various activities of the Bush administration, but would likely have less appetite for similar probes of the incoming Obama administration.
Dingell’s supporters said they are not worried by the vote of the Steering panel, which they say is stocked with left-leaning members who do not represent the broader makeup of Democratic Caucus.
“If you look at the makeup of that committee in terms of geography and political leanings, this is not the same dynamic as our whole caucus,” said Jim Matheson , D-Utah, who is part of a team working the phones for Dingell, D-Mich.
Dingell, 82, enjoys backing from moderate and Midwestern members, as well as lawmakers from the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
Waxman, D-Calif., and his supporters continued Thursday to take a quiet approach to the process. There were no news releases, conference calls or comments to the media.
Waxman has said he is confident of a win, though fewer members have publicly declared their support for him than for Dingell.
Dingell’s supporters say that among many Democrats, respect for the seniority system runs deep.
“We’re confident that Dingell will win,” said Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, D-S.D., another member of Dingell’s whip team. “As someone from a Great Plains state, I want someone with a great background not just in effectiveness, but in attentiveness to all regions of the country.”
Herseth added: “Each of us has to wonder, if we were just as effective, if we had just as proven a track record, how would we feel, if that was challenged?”
The Energy and Commerce Committee has some of the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional panel, handling legislation on topics as disparate as telecommunications and health care, energy and environmental protection, interstate commerce and consumer protection.
Dingell, first elected in December 1955 to take the seat previously held by his father, is the House’s longest-serving current member. He is a skilled legislator renowned for protecting the interests of his state’s auto industry.
Democratic Steering Panel Chooses Waxman Over Dingell
Waxman, who first won his House seat in 1974, has generally agreed with Dingell on health policy. But he has long clashed with the chairman over environmental issues, pushing for stronger clean air and fuel-efficiency laws.
Waxman is aligned with Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, but she has remained publicly neutral in the race for the Energy and Commerce panel chairmanship. Many Democrats doubt Waxman would have attempted the challenge, however, without her tacit support. He is expected to draw support from fellow liberals and from most of the big California delegation.
“This is Henry’s strongest venue,” said Dingell backer Rob Andrews, D-N.J., about the Steering Committee vote. “John exceeded expectations.”
Democrats said the last time the Steering Committee declined to nominate the top Democrat on a committee to remain in that position was in 1996, when Henry B. Gonzalez of Texas was rejected as ranking member of the Banking panel. The full caucus overturned that decision, and Gonzalez kept his gavel.
Hypothetically Speaking
Because of a Democratic Caucus rule, several Steering Committee regulars were unable to vote on Wednesday. And another member of the panel was away on official business.
If those lawmakers had been in the room, Dingell might have won the vote. Here’s how:
The panel typically includes the chairmen of the five “exclusive” committees: Appropriations, Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, Rules and Ways and Means.
Rules Chairwoman Louise M. Slaughter of New York is appointed by Pelosi — and not elected by the caucus — so she was permitted to vote. She did not reveal if she chose Waxman or Dingell.
Two others — Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New York — publicly expressed support for Dingell.
Appropriations Chairman David R. Obey of Wisconsin did not announce a preference.
John Tanner of Tennessee — a vocal supporter of Dingell — was returning from a trip to Spain where he was made president of the NATO Interparliamentary Assembly. A spokesman said Tanner would have voted for Dingell.
Taking all of that into account, and assuming that Dingell would have voted for himself, the Steering Committee would have at least tied 26-26.
Democratic Steering Panel Chooses Waxman Over Dingell
If Obey’s hypothetical vote went to Dingell, the Michigan lawmaker would have won 27-25.
First posted Nov. 19, 2008 1:52 p.m.




POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: