CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
Dec. 22, 2008 – 5:02 a.m.
Questions About Kennedy Recall Hillary Clinton’s First Race
By Emily Cadei, CQ Staff
A hot topic of debate in New York and elsewhere in the country is whether Caroline Kennedy, political neophyte and daughter of the late President John F. Kennedy, has the chops to be a U.S. senator.
But it wasn’t so long ago that New Yorkers were questioning the qualifications of another female Senate candidate with powerful connections and a universally recognized last name.
Back in 2000, skeptics dismissed then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton ’s run for retiring Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s seat, calling her a “carpetbagger” and criticizing her lack of legislative experience.
By Election Day, Clinton had silenced the critics and won the seat with room to spare, but now she will be leaving the seat open to be Secretary of State in President-elect Barack Obama ’s new Cabinet. Kennedy is considered a favorite to replace her.
The naysayers are once again out in full force, with debate raging in the media and blogosphere over Kennedy’s credentials, or lack thereof.
One point of contention: Is history repeating itself or is the current battle for New York’s Senate vacancy an entirely different phenomenon than in 2000?
There are obvious practical differences — Clinton ran for the seat eight years ago and had to prove her mettle on the campaign trail. Kennedy meanwhile, can only wait and hope to be selected by New York Gov. David Paterson, who is charged with replacing Clinton.
The lack of public input, at least until 2010 when a special election for the seat is held, has led to grumbling that the whole process is more suitable to a monarchy than a democracy.
An inspection of the two women’s resumes does, however, reveal some similarities, as both have pursued non-traditional career trajectories and have touted their civic engagement as qualifications for office.
Both Clinton and Kennedy have degrees from top-notch universities, capped by law degrees from Yale and Columbia, respectively.
Clinton, who is 10 years older than Kennedy, has used her law degree more directly — as a staff attorney for the nonprofit Children’s Defense Fund and the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry efforts against President Richard M. Nixon, and as a partner in the Arkansas-based Rose Law Firm.
Kennedy has not pursued a legal career, though she has applied her legal training by co-authoring books on the Bill of Rights and the right to privacy.
Clinton and Kennedy also share a demonstrated commitment to civic work. Clinton’s involvement has focused on the needs of women and children -- she has served as a board member of the Arkansas Children’s Hospital, co-founded the organization Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, and as first lady worked to expand early learning and child care and to increase funding for breast cancer research.
Kennedy is president of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, board member of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund and served as Chief Executive in the Office of Strategic Partnerships for the New York City Department of Education, which helped raise millions of dollars for public schools.
Some have dismissed the substance of Kennedy’s charitable work, but Paul Kirk, a friend and chairman of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, called Kennedy an “impact player,” adding that her ability to successfully juggle all her responsibilities reveals much about her.
“You have to be have a strong work ethic and be able to move from one issue to another,” to do what Kennedy does, he said. “That’s just one parallel with what a legislator has to do.”
Neither Kennedy nor Clinton had held political office prior to deciding to campaign for Senate, though Clinton was an important figure in her husband, Bill’s, Arkansas governorship and his presidential administration. Clinton points to this unofficial advisory role in both as part of her more than 30 years of experience in public service.
Perhaps most importantly from a campaign perspective, however, is the fact that both Clinton and Kennedy hail from politically powerful families.
As Steven M. Schneider, a political science professor at the State University of New York Institute of Technology noted, Clinton and Kennedy “came to be perceived as plausible candidates through their connections.”
Kennedy, Schneider added, in some ways “fits the tradition of the New York state senator,” noting many have not been traditional politicians that rose up the state ranks but rather have relied on a national profile to gain their seat.
The power of name recognition is nothing to scoff at, said Robert J. Spitzer, Chair of the Political Science Department at SUNY Cortland.
“In any election, anywhere, anytime it’s always an advantage if you can begin your race and already have people know who you are.”
Recent polling of New Yorkers backs this up — a Public Policy Polling survey conducted Dec. 8-9 had Kennedy as the top choice of Democrats at 44 percent, while a Siena Poll conducted Dec. 8-11 had Kennedy second among preferred selections, at 23 percent, following Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, himself the scion of one of the state’s best known political families.
Political and social connections are also crucially important in politics, the two political scientists said, and Kennedy has both of those in spades. Her friendship with President-elect Obama, borne out of her campaign endorsement last spring and her help vetting his vice presidential selection, could be particularly useful.
“In many respects what makes her candidacy plausible is Barack Obama ’s presidency,” said Spitzer. He explained that she can sell herself as part of the new generation of leaders, with a different perspective than a traditional politician.
Kennedy and Clinton do diverge in some notable ways, however. Kennedy has shied away from the political spotlight until recently, while Clinton has been smack dab in the middle of it since 1992.
Kennedy is also less of a career woman than Clinton has been — the latter famously commented that she was not the kind of woman who “stayed home and baked cookies,” while Kennedy’s “nine to five job has been as a wife and a mother,” said Kirk.
If she does in fact get the Senate appointment, Kennedy is going to have to become more like Clinton in order to defend the seat in 2010.
“If she’s appointed ... there may be a feeling that it’s being given to her simply as an entitlement,” said Spitzer.
To combat those doubts, Kennedy will have to do exactly what Clinton did in 2000, campaigning tirelessly on the ground and reaching out to upstate voters, in particular.
“Unless [Kennedy’s] plan is simply to be a placeholder, that is what she is going to have to do,” Spitzer said.




Comments
There are 2 big differences between Caroline and the Dragon Lady Clinton. 1. Caroline has integrity 2. Caroline is a real New Yorker. I am very pleased as a New Yorker to get Clinton out of the senate from New York. She has been a mediocre at best. The only things Clinton is good at are press releases, photo ops and putting her name on other senator's bills. She is all smoke and mirrors and a fraud !!!!!
Wouldn't Bloomberg be a better pick. He has a much stronger resume, also has deper pockets to help fund elections, removes a potential competitor for the governor's spot, and probably is more willing to work harder and longer than most people.
I disagree with Bonnie about Hillary Clinton. I think she is a good leader and she has been a good senator. I don't know enough about Mrs. Kennedy to characterize her skills but I don't have a problem with the daughter of John F. Kennedy becoming a senator of New York. I think the benefit of politically active families is we can remember who they are associated with and make generalizations based on that. For example, we shouldn't be surprised if Mrs. Kennedy has a drinking problem but we also shouldn't be surprised if she is effective at influencing legislation like her uncle.
I think it's time for American to start demanding our elected officials, have some experience. But, I guess Dems will vote for her, because she helped Obama, and because she's a Kennedy, and it's now time to pay them back for their support of Obama.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: