CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS
April 30, 2008 – 9:13 a.m.
Will Clinton Go All the Way to the Convention?
By Madison Powers, CQ Guest Columnist
The conventional wisdom now seems to be that it is only a matter of time until Sen. Hillary Clinton leaves the Democratic primary contest. It’s supposed to be a simple matter of the delegate math at this late stage.
A recent article in the Politico suggested that the inevitable was being denied in media coverage that makes it seem like the race is close when in fact it is not. While Clinton’s new post-Pennsylvania motto is “the tide is turning,” more and more observers seem to agree that the tide has already turned, and that it is not in Clinton’s favor. One can’t listen to the electoral math gurus like MSNBC’s Chuck Todd without a sense that the odds for Hillary are getting slim. David Brooks even went so far as to put the figure at only 5 percent.
For those who follow the online electronic markets, such as Intrade and Iowa Electronic Markets, the collective judgments of the betting world present a less sanguine picture. The current estimate is roughly 5 to 1 in favor of Obama over Clinton, but slightly below the almost 6 to 1 spread a couple of months ago. These are steep but not insurmountable odds.
For those who share the growing view that it is a matter of when, and not if, Clinton will exit the race, there is another piece of emerging conventional wisdom. The claim is that she will not carry the fight all the way to the convention.
There are good theories to back up that assessment. The Clintons want to remain politically relevant and are too prudent to risk the damage that would be done to their own reputations. They don’t want to be the spoilers who pursue their own interests over that of the Party and thereby deprive the Democrats of a victory in November.
But the evidence thus far seems to tell a different story. All the theories put forward for why this thing won’t end badly look like a recommendation, dressed up as prediction, by people who know full well what the Clintons’ intentions may be.
Representative James Clyburn recently pointed to President Clinton’s “bizarre” behavior and the growing sense he detects among those who doubt that the Clinton team is either sufficiently prudent in regard to their own futures or restrained enough to let party interests trump personal ambition.
Then there are Senator Clinton’s own words. She told FOX News’ Greta Van Susteren, “You know, you can always go to the convention. That’s what credential fights are for.” Whatever latitude with the truth the Clintons may take in reporting the past, there is little reason to doubt them when they tell us what they plan to do in the future.
The next question is whether we have any evidence that the Clintons or their supporters are taking any active steps toward extending their run beyond the primary season. There too, we have considerable evidence.
There are two crucial steps along the way to the convention opening on August 25th. The first item of business at the Convention in Denver is the report of the Credentials Committee, and the second is the report of the Rules and Bylaws Committee. Both committees meet in advance to consider pending challenges and issue a report, quite likely a majority and minority report that will be sent forward to the convention as a whole.
On May 31st, the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws committee meets to consider a petition asking that half of the pledged delegates from the disputed Michigan and Florida Democratic presidential primaries be counted, together with all of the superdelegates from those two states.
The likely outcome is uncertain, but two facts bear notice. First, the Rules and Bylaws Committee stripped both states of all their delegates, but it is arguable whether they had the authority to do so, given that the only unambiguous part of the set penalty was that there would be loss of half of the pledged delegates.
The Committee upped the ante on both states, and still both states went ahead with their accelerated primary schedules in defiance of the warning. A win for the Clinton camp on either or both challenges puts a considerable number of new delegates in the Clinton column.
Will Clinton Go All the Way to the Convention?
By one calculation, awarding half of the pledged delegates in the two states would give Clinton 89 more delegates and Obama 33.5, with 27.5 uncommitted out of Michigan where Obama was not on the ballot. In addition, the two states together account for 53 superdelegates who can be expected to overwhelmingly favor Clinton in both states.
The 27.5 uncommitted delegates from Michigan present the Clintons with another little noticed advantage. Under Michigan Party rules the primaries are the “first determinative step” in awarding pledged delegates. The last step in the process involves 15 district conventions that finalize the delegate selection process. Those conventions met on April 19th. The Clinton forces were far better organized than the Obama supporters, and they may well have packed the uncommitted slate with at least half who retain the right to vote for Clinton, and while officially uncommitted delegates, many may be Clinton stalwarts.
The Credentials Committee is expected to meet in June, and it has received far more attention than the Rules and Bylaws Committee. While it is ultimately the committee charged with adjudicating seating disputes (and the first to report to the convention), the Bylaws and Rules Committee, who will have a chance to weigh in on the challenges first, may set in motion a decision that could determine the outcome down the road in June. Thus far, handicappers have given Clinton little chance of prevailing with their challenges, but that estimate is predicated upon the assumption that the Credentials Committee is where the real action is. That too remains to be seen.
Those who think that Clinton will not go the whole distance may be right, and those who think the mathematical obstacles along the way, not only in remaining primaries, but in the process of the standing committees, are insurmountable may be right as well. But I think it is far too early to be call this a slam dunk for Obama. In fact, as we well know, that sort of judgment often turns out to be wrong.
Madison Powers is Senior Research Scholar at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University. Starting next week, his column appears on Wednesdays in CQ Politics.




Comments
specifically, jurisdiction passes to Credentials as of June 29th. whether R&B had authority to impose penalties in excess of those set forth in the rules as they stood should simply become irrelevant then; if there was ever a credentials fight you'd want to settle early, this is it, and the committee--does anyone know who's on it? who the chairs are?--will brush aside whatever the first committee did. if it means half a delegation, maybe that's what it will have to mean--and why is this a sudden discovery, that the DNC went beyond the specified punishment and did this monumentally stupid thing to Michigan and Florida? this all smells.
Interesting that there are no comments to this article. Hillary will have to be dragged off the convention podium. The only math she cares about right now is that Obama does not have the votes to win on the first ballot. I note that NO ONE has discussed that scenario.
POST A COMMENT
Oops! The following errors must be addressed: